Message Page 1 of 3 <br /> MATSLER Clara T <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:26 PM <br /> To: MATSLER Clara T <br /> Subject: FW: WRB - Section 4(f); 1 -5 bridge project <br /> Hi Clara, <br /> Lets discuss you doing a short letter for my signature as they are requesting. - Johnny <br /> From: Gregory, James [ mailto:James.Gregory©hdrinc.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 3:13 PM <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Cc: TAYLOR Trevor H; COX Jim B <br /> Subject: RE: WRB - Section 4(f); I -5 bridge project <br /> Hi Johnny -- <br /> This is a follow up to the request Jim Cox made for your concurrence (provided in the e -mail below) on the <br /> Section 4(f) de minimis finding for the 1 -5 Willamette Bridge project. ODOT has prepared the necessary <br /> documentation for FHWA, and included your e -mail as documentation of Eugene Parks and Open Space <br /> Division's concurrence with that determination. FHWA has requested that you provide your concurrence for the <br /> record in the form of a letter on your agency's letterhead (they didn't have a problem with the finding, but wanted <br /> more official documentation of concurrence). Thus, I'd like to request that you send a letter (to Jim) noting your <br /> your concurrence with the de minimis finding (pretty much what is summarized in the e-mail chain below). I have <br /> discussed this request with Trevor as well. <br /> If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. <br /> Thank you and best regards, <br /> James <br /> James Gregory AICP <br /> Oregon Bridge Delivery Partners/ <br /> HDR One Company 1 Many Solutions <br /> 1001 SW 5th Avenue Suite 1800 I Portland, OR 97204 <br /> ph: 503.423.3700 I fax: 503.423.3737 <br /> jamesgregory@hdrinc.com <br /> From: COX Jim B [ mailto :Jim.B.COX ©odot.state.or.us] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:03 AM <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Cc: TAYLOR Trevor H; WOLD Eric N; COREY Kurt A; Sakaguchi, Frances; Gregory, James; DODSON Timothy J <br /> Subject: RE: WRB - Section 4(f); I -5 bridge project <br /> 11/12/2008 <br />