New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Amazon Park Rare Plants
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Amazon Park Rare Plants
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2014 2:21:09 PM
Creation date
8/21/2014 2:02:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EUGENE Public Works <br /> Maintenance <br /> City of Eugene <br /> 1820 Roosevelt Boulevard <br /> Eugene, Oregon 97402 <br /> (541) 682 -4800 <br /> January 19, 1999 <br /> Dr. Rhoda Love <br /> 393 Ful Vue Drive <br /> Eugene, OR 97405 <br /> Dear Dr. Love: <br /> You called on January 15 to register a complaint that a park bench was installed last year within <br /> the area of Amazon Park delineated as a Lomatium bradshawii conservation easement. My <br /> answer to you at the time of the conversation reflected the fact that I did not have full knowledge <br /> of the details surrounding the bench placement. I've since checked with maintenance staff, <br /> reviewed the conservation agreement for the area, and reviewed the notes of the plant survey <br /> done by John Koenig and Ethen Perkins, and spoken by phone with John. With that review done <br /> I think the following comments are worth making. <br /> First, the Maintenance Supervisor informed me that our maintenance staff were asked to check <br /> the site for Lomatium before installing the bench. Contrary to what I told John by phone, it was <br /> someone other than our wetland specialist, Jesse Cary -Hobbs who checked for the plant's <br /> presence. Our staff who maintain the area, however, are able to identify the plant, and any plants <br /> present would have been visible in the spring when the work was done. The donor of the bench <br /> was informed that we had to choose a place that did not have the protected plants. <br /> The field notes of John and Ethen, who surveyed the area almost four years ago, did not indicate <br /> the presence of Lomatium at the bench site. Jesse did comment that the bench site is a little <br /> higher than the spot at which several plants exist to the west of this site, and on the north side of <br /> the trail. The odds of seed being transported by water or mechanically to this location seem <br /> remote enough to suggest that our staff probably did not overlook any new, plants since the <br /> original survey. <br /> Second, in our phone conversation you mentioned the need to mitigate for plants that were likely <br /> removed. I believe the evidence now shows that none were lost as a result of the bench <br /> installation. I nevertheless looked to see if the agreement contained anything about mitigating <br /> for any disturbance to the habitat area of concern and found nothing. <br /> Referring to the agreement and the City's 8th responsibility, the statement specifies that the other <br /> parties to the agreement shall be notified regarding proposed activity in high quality habitat (for <br /> the Lomatium). What distinguishes a "high quality habitat" from a medium or low quality <br /> habitat might be a contentious point in the future. Therefore, I hope that the NPSO might <br /> develop some descriptions, with accompanying actual site examples, for high, medium and low <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.