POSSIBLE OPTIONS TO AGREEMENT WITH CITY <br /> City owns land.... City gives land, Developer leases for low rent <br /> City doesn't own land Developer Buys Land, and Donates, Leases back <br /> City owns land which needs infrastructure County may participate with infrastructure $ <br /> Developer should prepare for worst case of full payment. or <br /> City Council could really get be hind it and setup funding vehicle for it. <br /> SWEDE JOHNSON AGREEMENT ISSUES <br /> Should be viewed as a model of the framework of a joint agreement with City. <br /> . Public Benefit: non- season use, use upon consent, 4J kids on PC teams benefit <br /> Concern for agreement might be is there and endowment for future operations <br /> MAJOR STEPS JIM SEES TO PROCEEDING <br /> Identifii Site <br /> Concept Plan - to paint vision for support <br /> Concept Costs - range, and separate price for infrastructure <br /> Development Position - how much private $ willing to commit <br /> Agreement Outline - ala Swede Johnson <br /> Pre Development Presentation <br /> Public works, transportation,planning - discuss concerns and participation <br /> DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE <br /> Site and Landuse will be key issues <br /> City Agreement can be done in two steps; 1- outline, 2- complete <br /> City will not speed up landuse, plans review, etc times... wait in same line <br /> memo \97 -02 -27 <br />