New Search
HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: ETTER John F <br /> To: MORGAN Dick A; HAMMITT Bob; JOHNSON Jim R <br /> Subject: Draft Bambino Agreement <br /> Date: Friday, September 26, 1997 4:15PM <br /> My comments according to the numbers in the draft: <br /> Recital 2 -- 50 years seems long. Howabout 25, then renewals of 10 or more years. <br /> Agreement 1 vs 19: The spirit of #19 should be reflected in #1, or the two should be combined, in order <br /> to get away from being overly exclusive. <br /> 3. Shorter renewal periods <br /> 5b. Not sure we can commit to daily maintenance immediately. Maybe someday when more of the park is <br /> developed for other uses. <br /> 6. I think the name of the field should be subject to City approval. I don't know why the second sentence <br /> is 6 is needed. <br /> 8. I think the City should have some controls over the products sold in the complex 141c.4a (s, <br /> 11. Given the length of the lease, I think the limits of insurance should be indexed up in COLA fashion. <br /> Consider the following language: "Using the original insurance limits as a base, the limits shall be indexed <br /> upward as necessary so as to never be more than 5% below the original limits, as compounded annually by <br /> the annual cost of living index." Someone might be able to say that better. <br /> 18. It seems that unless Parks rejoins Recreation that the notices should go to the Parks Maintenance <br /> Manager who represents the Owner, at 1820 Roosevelt Blvd. If there is a reorganization, the Park <br /> Maintenance Manager would still be the point person, wherever he /she is located. <br /> 19. Who schedules the facility when the Bambino season is not up and running? A contact on the City's <br /> end should be at the Recreation Div. <br /> Page 1 <br />