Subject: lights at Ascot Park <br /> Date: Thursday, October 14, 1993 2:34PM <br /> FROM: RIS1(CEEXPCN) <br /> TO: EUG001(CERMJFE) DATE: 10 -14-93 <br /> TIME: 14:36 <br /> CC: <br /> • <br /> SUBJECT: lights at Ascot Park <br /> PRIORITY: <br /> ATTACHMENTS: <br /> Date: 10/14/93 <br /> From: Paul Nicholson CEEXPCN - RIS1 <br /> To: John Etter CERMJFE - EUG001 <br /> Subject: lights at Ascot Park <br /> Please bring me up to speed on the following: <br /> 1) Are there any other "community parks" North of the river. <br /> If so, what dictated Ascot as the elected park for lighted <br /> fields. <br /> 2) Are there other parks south of the river that were considered? <br /> What factors made these less desirable? <br /> 3) Was the option of lighting fields at Sheldon in cooperation with <br /> 4J schools considered. If not, can this option be explored? <br /> 4) What are the comparative numbers of homes within 50 yards and <br /> 100 yards for existing lighted fields (include Kincaid feild). <br /> 5) What is the feasibility of designating Ascot park for kids <br /> athletics exclusively with a 10PM curfew? <br /> 6) What steps could we take to mitigate common concerns expressed: <br /> e.g. litter, bathroom access, rowdy behavior at adult events, <br /> parking in residential areas. <br /> Page 3 <br />