New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Park Acquisitions
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Park Acquisitions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2014 10:20:15 AM
Creation date
8/7/2014 10:20:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Cc: FERGUSON Joe M <br /> Subject: RE: Land exchange -- consent calendar item <br /> Date: Tuesday, November 05, 1996 8:07AM <br /> Thanks for sending the copy of the letter from Linda to City <br /> Council. Here are some questions that you will need to <br /> address in the briefing statement. <br /> 1. In the letter you refer to having entered into an exchange <br /> agreement dated July 17, 1996. How can you do that prior to <br /> the Council declaring the property surplus? Seems premature <br /> to have done that unless there is some clause that says this <br /> is subject to completion of the surplus declaration. Need to <br /> have the history clarified for council. <br /> 2. Is this identified in the parks plan or Willakenzie Plan as a park site? <br /> 3. What is the value of each parcel, how was the value set <br /> (general terms), and how is the difference being funded? <br /> 4. Why is this not being advertised as being surplus to the <br /> general public? You will need to explain why this is an <br /> appropriate action to only consider one property owner and why <br /> an exchange is preferred. Do we have any other examples of <br /> similar actions (Council history ?) I'm sure there are <br /> efficiencies and other justifications you can articulate. <br /> 5. What options exist for the Council to consider? <br /> ( Alternatives section of briefing). <br /> So, there you go. All that from a one paragraph memo. Sorry <br /> but these are questions that would likely come up and if we <br /> don't address them you can bank on it being pulled from <br /> consent. The more you can argue this is a good deal for the <br /> City and not a sweetheart deal for a "developer ", the more <br /> likely you are to succeed. <br /> Good luck. Thanks Les L <br /> From: ROYER Russ C <br /> To: ETTER John F; MEDLIN Johnny R; LYLE Les A <br /> Subject: RE: Land exchange -- consent calendar item <br /> Date: Tuesday, November 05, 1996 7:49AM <br /> I faxed the original packet to Les and one to John and Johnny <br /> yesterday. If either of you didn't receive, please let me <br /> know. rr <br /> From: ETTER John F <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R; LYLE Les A <br /> Cc: ROYER Russ C <br /> Subject: RE: Land exchange -- consent calendar item <br /> Date: Monday, November 04, 1996 5:07PM <br /> I just called Russ, who will e-mail to Les what was wanted. - -John <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: LYLE Les A <br /> Cc: ETTER John F <br /> Subject: RE: Land exchange -- consent calendar item <br /> Date: Monday, November 04, 1996 3:06PM <br /> Ok, <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.