New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
4J Stadium, October 1999 Forward
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
4J Stadium, October 1999 Forward
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2014 10:07:13 AM
Creation date
8/7/2014 10:06:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FEB -29 -2000 08:37 SD4J FACILITIES MANAGMENT 1 541 687 3686 P.06/24 <br /> February 23, 2000 <br /> Page 2 <br /> After responses were received by proposers, the Selection Committee met and evaluated <br /> those proposals. The Committee entered ratings relative to the proposals for the project and created <br /> a relevant ranking, as follows; <br /> Name Points Rankine <br /> 1. Bones Construction (Avery Sports Turf) 93 1 <br /> 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel (Field'Lbrf) 85 2 <br /> 3, Southwest Recreational Ind. (AstroPlay) 65 3 <br /> As a result of those conclusions, on January 28, 2000, the District wrote Bones Construction <br /> of its intention to award the contract to the "top ranked firm" and provided in that letter that "this <br /> notification serves as the Intent to Award as specified in the R.R." with a copy to Eugene Sand & <br /> Gravel and Southwest Recreational Industries. <br /> On February 9, 1999, Eugene Sand & Gravel (hereafter ES &G) submitted a letter which it <br /> entitled its "protest" of the intention to award the contract to Bones Construction, and in which four <br /> issues were raised: <br /> A. Timeliness of the protest period; <br /> B. Objections to the manufacturer's qualifications; <br /> C. Objections to the installer's qualifications; and <br /> D. Objection as to the form of the warranty submitted. <br /> These three issues will be dealt with hereinbelow. <br /> The 1999 Legislature passed modifications to ORS 279.029 which were effective 10/23/99. <br /> The relevant Attorney General's Model Public Contract Rules Manual controlling this RFP is the <br /> one published in October of 1998 by Hardy Myers, Attorney General and referenced in the RFP <br /> appropriately, by OAR sections. <br /> A. Timeliness of Protest. <br /> The Oregon Administrative Rules provide procedural and administrative guidelines. These <br /> are referred to above as "Model Public Contract Rules." <br /> OAR 137 - 030 - 0104(3) is entitled "Notice of Award" and provides in part: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.