New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
4J Stadium, October 1999 Forward
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
4J Stadium, October 1999 Forward
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2014 10:07:13 AM
Creation date
8/7/2014 10:06:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> Youth Sports Parks <br /> Response to 43 proposal <br /> January 5, 2001 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Concerns about the 43 Proposal <br /> 1. The proposal is predicated on the idea that there are boundary lines delineating the <br /> Youth Sports Parks from the Athletic Fields and that the risks and liabilities can <br /> therefore be easily separated, but this isn't the case. <br /> 2. The proposal would require that maintenance responsibilities be segregated, with 4J <br /> responsible for maintenance of the athletic fields and the City responsible for <br /> maintenance of the Youth Sports Parks. <br /> ► The current maintenance agreement between the entities is based on <br /> functionality, staff expertise and practicality and was developed <br /> specifically to promote inter - agency cooperation, efficiency and wise use <br /> of public funds. Examples are the coordinated mowing program and <br /> irrigation maintenance, which is area where the City has specific expertise. <br /> ► Undoing the cooperative maintenance agreement and going back to <br /> segregated maintenance responsibilities would be inefficient and costly. It <br /> would shift workloads to areas where there is inadequate capacity (for <br /> ti example, 43 doesn't have as large an irrigation maintenance capacity as <br /> the City) and would result in an inefficient use of resources. <br /> ► PWM staff feels that the current maintenance agreement is working well <br /> for both entities. <br /> 3. The 43 proposal would make the City responsible for all claims arising from the <br /> skate parks, including claims alleging design defects. <br /> ► The City and 4J jointly participated in the design development and 43 <br /> administered the design contract. <br /> ► 43 is currently scheduling the Cal Young Skate Park. <br /> 4. The IGA was written by 43 staff Bill Hirsch and David Piercy. The current 43 <br /> proposal would totally change the previous agreement regarding liability issues <br /> and require that the IGA be re- written. <br /> ► The current 43 proposal is not consistent with previous discussions, <br /> fi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.