New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
4J Stadium, October 1999 Forward
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
4J Stadium, October 1999 Forward
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2014 10:07:13 AM
Creation date
8/7/2014 10:06:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KROECK Louis G , RI, 10:43 AM 8/11/99 , Interview Questions <br /> To: KROECK Louis G < Louis .G.KROECK @ci.eugene.or.us >, RINER Andrea G <br /> <Andrea.G. RINER@ ci. eugene.or.us >,jeff.lankston @ci. eugene. or .us <br /> From: Bill Hirsh <hirsh @eug4ja.Iane.edu> <br /> Subject: Interview Questions <br /> Cc: <br /> Bcc: <br /> Andrea, would you forward this to Teri. <br /> Here is a summary of my understanding of our (draft) interview questions: <br /> For both firms: <br /> 1. What is the most challenging part of the project schedule? What specifically will you do to keep the project <br /> on schedule? What do you believe the Owner must do to maintain the schedule? <br /> 2. What is your proposed approach to the public involvement/participation component of design? <br /> 3. What is your proposed approach to the parks and open space component of the design? <br /> 4. How will you ensure that the construction is appropriate find acceptable for the skate board park? <br /> 5. How do you propose to adequately integrate the procurement and construction of the infrastructure for the <br /> synthetic fields with the separate procurement and construction of the synthetic surfaces themselves? <br /> 6. What do you see as the greatest opportunity related to this project? <br /> For WRG: <br /> 7. What is your understanding of the community values and issues with respect to this project? <br /> 8. ? ?? <br /> For WBGS: <br /> 7. What are the resources on your team or what other resources will you acquire to ensure the design and <br /> quality design and installation of the most effective synthetic surface fields? <br /> 8. Can you propose ways in which the proposed NTE limit for your consultant services can be reduced <br /> significantly? <br /> FYI: <br /> Both firms have been asked to do presentations which: (1) Describe recent comparable project(s) and (2) <br /> address their approach to our project, including discussion of programming, budget, schedule, and clarification <br /> and specificity of the roles and responsibilities of the individual members of their team and the (time) <br /> commitment to the project. <br /> Printed for Bill Hirsh <hirsh@eug4ja.lane.edu> 1 <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.