New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Ridgeline Trail
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
POS Director
>
Ridgeline Trail
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 1:21:46 PM
Creation date
8/6/2014 1:21:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Document_Number
Ridgeline Trail
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. It seems that since the time when I contacted your office and Sept 21 <br /> when a copy of the Riner email was sent to me, a dog leg connector trail <br /> has been built between the remaining trail and the area behind the <br /> relocated (sic) sign. <br /> The mouth of the new trail portion, sign placement and orientation, <br /> to my knowledge, does not meet national standards for a multi -use <br /> recreational trail (This portion of the Ridgeline Trail was funded for use by <br /> both mountain bikes and hikers. Funding and labor was solicited and <br /> accepted by the city specifically under terms that it would be maintained <br /> as such.) <br /> For the year since the trailhead was destroyed no temporary signage <br /> was installed to aid the public in accessing what was left of the trail. <br /> I have since been contacted by Phil Richardson, who agreed to meet me at <br /> the site and walk it with me. I withheld writing this reply until that <br /> meeting occurred. At that meeting Mr Richardson agreed that <br /> a) management of the trailhead had been less than professional, <br /> b) the trailhead signage at Spring Blvd was destroyed, what is left is <br /> damaged and subject to further damage from the way it now stands, <br /> c) present orientation and placement of the remaining trailhead signage <br /> creates a confusing and dangerous situation for the public. <br /> Mr Richardson mentioned agreement for the Parks Department to move <br /> the sign to a better location. However, he made no specific pledge to <br /> rebuild the trailhead to its originally funded and built specification as a <br /> multi -use recreation trail. Actually, everything he said at our meeting was <br /> undercut by the caveat that he was just a lowly technician with no <br /> authority as to how money really gets spent. <br /> This is a disappointing state of affairs. Hundreds of dollars and thousands <br /> of grunt volunteer labor built that trail in good faith. I, and many others, <br /> lived with poison oak infections for months, showering with 16 oz bottles <br /> of Technu for the better part of a year. There were even Monday Night <br /> gravel hauling parties illuminated by Coleman lanterns hung in the trees to <br /> hauling wheelbarrows of gravel uphill to harden the trail surface before <br /> the record rains that came that winter. <br /> That trailhead was sited specifically where the Parks Dept. told us to place <br /> the trail and trailhead which, incidentally, meant clearing a 20 x 20 ft <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.