New Search
17.4 ESEE Consequences Analysis <br /> Sites E37 11 (S Hills at Upper Owl Road); E37I (S Hills at St. Clair); E37J (S Hills at <br /> Lower Owl Road /Fox Hollow); E37K (S Hills at Canyon Drive /Fox Hollow), E37L <br /> (S Hills at Center Way); E37M (S Hills at Dillard); AMA -13 (Owl Road wetland) <br /> OAR 660- 023 -0040 (2) and 660 - 023 - 0040(4) require local governments to analyze the <br /> "positive and negative economic, social, environmental and energy (ESEE) consequences of <br /> allowing, limiting or prohibiting conflicting uses within a resource site." "Conflicting uses" are <br /> those uses that could adversely affect a significant Goal 5 resource site. Conflicting uses for <br /> these sites, and the potential adverse effects of those uses, are discussed in further detail in <br /> Section 17.3 Conflicting Uses, above. The relationship between the quality of the resource and <br /> the magnitude of ESEE consequences (economic, social, environmental, and energy <br /> consequences) is discussed in further detail in Section 4, ESEE Consequences and Section 4.1, <br /> Key Resource Characteristics. This section summarizes these various analyses for each of the <br /> above sites. <br /> 17.4.1 Key Resource Characteristics <br /> As discussed in Section 4.1, Key Resource Characteristics, the degree to which there are <br /> positive or negative consequences of allowing, limiting, or prohibiting conflicting uses, <br /> depends in part on the relative quality of the resource site. Relative resource quality can be <br /> indicated in part through "key resource characteristics." Resource characteristics that were <br /> evaluated for the above sites are given in Table 17.4.1 below. Some of these characteristics are <br /> further discussed below and in Section 17.1, Site Descriptions. <br /> ESEE Analysis Page 9 <br />