New Search
HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: PATRICK Tim W <br /> Cc: ETTER John F; HAMMITT Bob; POST Doug A; JOHNSON Jim R; ANDERSEN Chris F; <br /> SVENDSEN Glen L; SMITH Terry M <br /> Subject: RE: PETERSEN LIGHTING <br /> Date: Tuesday, August 06, 1996 8:16AM <br /> Hi Tim, <br /> I'm unaware of what the status of the project is. From Terry Smith's note below he made a number of <br /> assignments of work to be done. Doug Post and I discussed how we can come up with our $15K from the <br /> A -6 category of the CIP and will make that happen once the project is confirmed. <br /> I'm not aware if the formal agreement with Bethel was ever put together to tie down the $15K they were <br /> to put toward the project. From Terry's note I think this was something Chris or Jim was going to do. I'm <br /> unaware if Engineering has placed any formal design time into the project. <br /> (Terry, do you know anything more regarding this project ?) <br /> Thanks <br /> Johnny <br /> From: PATRICK Tim W <br /> To: ETTER John F; MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Cc: TOMPKINS Yvaughn G <br /> Subject: PETERSEN LIGHTING <br /> Date: Monday, August 05, 1996 9:10PM <br /> Do either of you have any new information about the Petersen <br /> Park Lighting project? Jim Lynch, the ABC Chairperson asked <br /> me about the status tonight at their monthly meeting. <br /> Thanks. TIM <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: SMITH Terry M; PATRICK Tim W; JOHNSON Jim R; ANDERSEN Chris F <br /> Cc: POST Doug A; ETTER John F; KROECK Louis G; HAMMITT Bob <br /> Subject: RE: Petersen Park Lighting Project <br /> Date: Tuesday, April 02, 1996 1:47PM <br /> Hi Terry, <br /> From John Etter, I received the below as the estimate you requested in your memo attached below. <br /> After consulting with Louie a few moments ago we believe $1500 per light figure will work. We should go <br /> with 20 lights ($30,000). The new steel pole has not been accepted as the new standard so we'll <br /> continue to use the old fiberglass one. The savings in materials, however, would be offset by the higher <br /> costs of electrician services. - -John <br /> The only CIP funds we have direct access to are in A -6 (maintenance of existing site assets). I'm not <br /> aware of any parks related projects in the "B" (service enhancement) category except Sheldon Parking lot <br /> Entry where the money has all been already committed. While I'm not real comfortable in robbing already <br /> inadequate maintenance funds for the construction of a new asset, I will work with Doug Post to come up <br /> with a proposal regarding where we'll get our $15K portion. Perhaps he will have some other ideas of <br /> where we can obtain the funds. <br /> Either Engineering or Parks Planning could do this contract, however our agreement with Engineering is to <br /> have them do anything over $10 -20K. Due to the full workload of both Parks Planning and Engineering, <br /> we have had to make individual exceptions to this rule (after gaining consent of both divisions). For this <br /> Page 1 <br />