New Search
HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: SMITH Terry M; HAMMITT Bob; JOHNSON Jim R; PATRICK Tim W <br /> Subject: RE: Petersen Park Project <br /> Date: Tuesday, June 20, 1995 2:19PM <br /> The path is listed in the Parks and Recreation Plan as a MEDIUM priority implementation action. The <br /> project is not listed in any funding schemes in the current CIP. We haven't even been able to get many of <br /> the HIGH priority items from the P &R Plan funded in past years CIP efforts. With the new CIP format, used <br /> the last couple of years, which makes only the category "B" funding available for improvements or <br /> enhancements (and those funds spoke for many times over) it is unlikely this project would get very far <br /> even if we skipped the competing HIGH priority items from the P &R Plan. <br /> Thanks <br /> Johnny <br /> From: SMITH Terry M <br /> To: PATRICK Tim W; MEDLIN Johnny R; JOHNSON Jim R; HAMMITT Bob <br /> Subject: Petersen Park Project <br /> Date: Monday, June 19, 1995 2:38PM <br /> I hope this ties up the loose ends on this. I talked to Mike G. & he says <br /> that Pat has an idea that Bethel SD can pay for the project out of their bond <br /> levy. MG is calling Hunsacker to see if they can do that & we'll do the <br /> project if they can. Johnny, am I correct that this project is in our plan <br /> but is not funded in future years in the CIP? When I here from MG about the <br /> result of his conversation, I'II let you know. Jim, I told Mike that someone <br /> in PW can do the IGA with Bethel SD - its ok w/ me if you want to do it to <br /> build some ties w/ the SD. <br /> Page 1 <br />