New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Owen Rose Garden
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
POS Director
>
Owen Rose Garden
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 10:21:41 AM
Creation date
8/6/2014 10:17:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Owen Rose Garden
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: ETTER John F; MORGAN Dick A; WEBER John J; GRISSELL Dee; BLACK Bradley G <br /> Cc: HAMMITT Bob; MARTIN Vic R <br /> Subject: RE: Owen Facility - summary of discussion topics <br /> Date: Tuesday, January 23, 1996 7:24AM <br /> Hi Brad, <br /> I think you covered the issues well. The only thing that we might want to include is that based on earlier <br /> estimates from PWF and some of your concerns about underground issues which may not have been <br /> covered in that earlier estimate, the amount we are going to be asking for from the FY -97 CIP General Fund <br /> Category "B" looks to be in the $150 -200K range. Hopefully it will be on the low side of that estimate. <br /> I want to make sure everyone concerned knows about our need and approximate amount from the CIP as <br /> early as possible. <br /> Thanks <br /> Johnny <br /> From: BLACK Bradley G <br /> To: ETTER John F; MORGAN Dick A; WEBER John J; MEDLIN Johnny R; GRISSELL Dee <br /> Cc: MARTIN Vic R <br /> Subject: Owen Facility - summary of discussion topics <br /> Date: Monday, January 22, 1996 4:51 PM <br /> Based upon our discussion this afternoon, the following are my understandings: <br /> 1. The source of construction funding needs to be identified. <br /> The current discussion centers around using a portion of next <br /> fiscal years Category "B" CIP funds to cover the construction <br /> cost. I will follow up on this issue within PWF. <br /> 2. The current goal is to get the design and documentation <br /> work completed as soon as is reasonably possible. This will <br /> include preparing a schematic design, site plan, refined <br /> program and cost estimate within the next 30 to 45 days. The <br /> cost estimate will be used to address future funding needs. <br /> These items will be reviewed and approved by the group prior <br /> to starting design development or working drawings. <br /> 3. If the start of construction is going to be delayed beyond <br /> this next summer, some form of temporary arrangements will be <br /> considered. This could include the use of a modular building <br /> and storage containers to house current activities. Concern <br /> was expressed that these are costs that do not contribute to <br /> the permanent solutions. <br /> 4. Concern was expressed about eliminating places for persons <br /> to hide as part of any new design. <br /> 5. Concern was expressed about siting issues. I will work with John Etter on this. <br /> 6. Communications will be to all those present at todays <br /> meeting. Responses are not required unless appropriate. <br /> 7. After selection of an architect, I will prepare and <br /> distribute an anticipated schedule. <br /> 8. Dee will act as the contact person for staff at the garden. <br /> Please let me know if I have missed any major points. <br /> Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.