New Search
Date: 01/19/93 <br /> From: John Etter CERMJFE - RIS1 <br /> To: Linda Norris CEPNLHN - RIS1 <br /> Subject: The question about guaranteeing public access to golf <br /> I realize I didn't mention that to you as we talked an hour ago. Actually, <br /> we decided to not go beyond the answer that Lee gave in the 6/25 memo. In- <br /> formally, the owners agreed to including a 10 year deed restriction; they did <br /> not want an indefinite one. Staff are concurring with Lee's statement at the <br /> end: the market situation makes it unlikely that it could go private even if it <br /> wanted to, at least for a long time. We think we should try to get as much <br /> our of it as possible so far as being open to the public. Given the attrac- <br /> tiveness of the trade result, we would not favor killing the deal by demanding <br /> a deed restriction in perpetuity. <br /> One thing that might happen is some kind of membership situation such as has <br /> been proposed for the Hult Center, Community Centers and Library. If such <br /> memberships become the way the City does business, we should not restrict <br /> a golf developer from doing something similar. <br /> ('' (7 ..„ - <br /> i <br /> U *" <br /> -- Oh <br /> a'slc <br /> d P 1/1,01 ca n 1 WA i j I/1 <br /> ( \,,,,, . <br /> r vi 66 : ‘ O <br /> ( IA W 1 1 si <br /> e,e- av 0 ■ API <br /> V ' L v d ellelAc- P-0140' ct 1-- 3 511 1/141k1. 0/0 "6 <br /> J d <br /> ,, ti?, vio <br /> f it vi <br /> ok <br /> duff' I) <br /> co ( 1 j 4e- Ck <br /> I °nit <br /> io vd 46 Lin b <br /> ° f 1 I . t d 4.):_ <br /> 0--- oia' <br /> ") j fol'a SS /� 14 j c <br /> r , <br /> 4) I <br /> 5S� <br />