components. At a second meeting he attended on July 13, regarding EWEB's property on the <br />Willamette River in downtown Eugene, he heard the same concern expressed by Dennis <br />(Whitey) Lueck, local environmentalist. <br />He recommended that representatives from the Rowell Brokaw Architects firm, who were <br />facilitating the EWEB master plan process, be invited to a future Government Relations <br />subcommittee meeting to have a discussion. For both the Walnut Station and EWEB projects, <br />Mr. Sonnichsen said, some people were advocating for dense development with commercial and <br />perhaps governmental and park functions, while others wanted very sensitive consideration of <br />the environment before planning moved forward. <br />Ms. Behm wondered if the Government Relations subcommittee ought to look into the ORI <br />building issue as well. Mr. Sonnichsen said he would talk to other committee members to see if <br />this was wanted. The Riverfront Research Park could impact the Whilamut Natural Area, he <br />said, because if it got developed, he thought there would be pressure to convert the Autzen <br />Footbridge into a vehicle - carrying bridge extending through the natural area on the north bank. <br />He welcomed any CPC members to give feedback about whether to get involved with this issue. <br />Responding to a question by Ms. Larison, Mr. Sonnichsen clarified that the ORI building would <br />be located at the far west of the Riverfront Research Park, abutting the EWEB property. <br />c. Signage <br />Ms. Mello reported that her committee had discussed temporary signs for nesting season and <br />researched what previous signs had been used. The group needed to meet again and possibly <br />connect with the Wildlife/ Habitat subcommittee on this issue. <br />d. Outreach <br />Ms. Behm reported that the Talking Stone project was in progress for four new stones. Lisa <br />Ponder, who had done the previous eleven stones, had declined to do more and recommended <br />Mark Andrew. Many trees that were in the ODOT right -of -way were slated to be removed, she <br />said. Two weeks ago the group had met and Jeff Ard had done a great job of looking through the <br />plans. The project had designated 1% for art, or $1.5 million, to go to art and architectural <br />landscape features. <br />Ms. Behm asked if the subcommittee's process for dealing with ODOT issues was still okay with <br />the larger CPC committee, in terms of working with the trail issue, where they would make a <br />recommendation, send it out to the larger committee asking for feedback, and then making a <br />decision. The group had met and walked over the whole area recently, she noted. They were <br />leaning toward recommending adding the temporary 1000' of trail in the east area, she said, and <br />asked that if CPC members disagreed, they walk through the area and get back to the <br />subcommittee soon with additional recommendations. <br />7. Staff Reports <br />MINUTES — Citizen Planning Committee for July 16, 2009 5 <br />Whilamut Natural Area <br />