New Search
City of Eugene <br /> Public Works Department <br /> 9. Workload distribution and operational efficiency in Engineering. <br /> A small group was working on this issue, but Kurt told them to hold off until the current review is <br /> finished (WRT and Development & Review Team). Check in with Kurt to revisit this. <br /> 10. Recent changes in Plan Review process and the effects on Maintenance and <br /> Transportation involvement. <br /> The group had a lot of energy about this issue. 131 funds are being utilized to pay for 151 work. <br /> This is due to the lack of money the self - supporting mandate creates for Planning staff. <br /> 11. Lines of distinction for certain responsibilities related to design review and inspection <br /> of street, bike path and signals and lighting. <br /> Engineering completes most of the work for this issue. It seems to be working well. <br /> 12. Relationship between Maintenance and sign /striping crews. <br /> This issue relates to number 1. <br /> 13. Explore opportunities for equipment and personnel resource sharing. <br /> This issue relates to number 1. <br /> 14. Revisit Parking Enforcement move to Planning and Development. <br /> NO specific comments to add during discussion. <br /> 15. Develop stronger ties with regional transportation partners. <br /> Change the word develop to maintain and improve. <br /> 16. Project contracting and administration standards for conceptual identification, <br /> design, bidding and building. <br /> Change the word standards to process guidelines. Roles in capital projects get mixed up. This issue <br /> also relates to 11 and 16. <br /> 17.Administration — reception for 858 Pearl and support for three divisions. <br /> No extra comments. <br /> 18. Engineering /Administration relationship - capital funds management, capital projects <br /> budgeting, funding and management. <br /> This is an issue across the divisions in PW. Roles and responsibilities regarding capital projects and <br /> the management offunds related to capital projects should be reviewed. We are using old practices. <br /> Maybe there is a better way? <br /> 19. Placement of utility billing. <br /> Where should utility billing be located? Is it ok? <br /> 20. Relationship between Engineering and Airport. <br /> This issue is OK. Some members of the group thought it should be on the review list. <br /> 21.CIP Planning Process. <br />