TEAM FORMATION PLAN <br /> Issue: Dev - op and maintain consistent approaches to benchmarks, performance <br /> measures, bu geting, etc. <br /> Team Members. Peter, Jim, Bob, Susan W., Brian G., Chris H., Dick S., Roland (faeiIitator) <br /> The Purpose of till Team: <br /> This Team was Formed - use: There is confusion about perk,' ance measures and <br /> benchmarks. City has a policy - view team working on this issue. he findings and the Executive <br /> Team's reaction are unknown an • should be communicated. <br /> The Known Constraints of this • • ject are: <br /> The Team is charged with Consulta 've (Level 3) I, ision- Making Authority. <br /> The action team provides research, anal s, creativity, = nd solid thinking to produce a series of process <br /> design recommendations orso/utions, but e team •Ids no authority to decide on which, if any, will <br /> be implemented. As a caution, team mem • - m not set their hearts on a particular <br /> recommendation and then fee/ disappointed i ; decision is not implemented <br /> Team /Sponsor Communication Requirem - is Are: <br /> Team /Department- Division Manag - nt Com • unication Requirements Are <br /> The Team Ground Rules: <br /> How Will We Know hen We're Finished? <br /> How Will We M sure Success? <br /> Start Date: Target Completion Da : <br /> Remarks, mments, Additional Documentation: <br />