New Search
Cc: RIKHOFF Greg S; HAMMITT Bob <br /> Subject: RE: Scobert Park AC- -12/17 Meeting Minutes <br /> Date: Friday, December 20, 1996 11:20AM <br /> only made a few minor corrections on the minutes and am <br /> faxing my copy to Carrie. Dan, you did a masterful job of <br /> making Montez's dissertation into a cogent summary. <br /> On Tom's e-mail: I think you can treat it in the minutes next <br /> time just like you treated it this time -- describe the issue <br /> around it without describing the content. Its clear now we <br /> are going to have to put this on the agenda, and let them take <br /> a vote on it. As for an exec session - -I haven't a clue <br /> whether we could or should handle it that way. Lauren, do you <br /> think we should get a legal opinion? <br /> At the least, we need to brief Dave W and Christine that the <br /> issue is continuing. I'll take care of Dave. <br /> Another thing I'm struggling with is how to make sure <br /> everybody has the information to make an informed decision. <br /> It looks like maybe half of the committee members by now have <br /> read the note, and of those who have read it, I expect they <br /> would all vote to remove Tom. It's not fair to ask the others <br /> to vote based on something they've heard described in general <br /> terms as disgusting but which they themselves haven't seen. <br /> On the other hand, I still recoil violently from sending it <br /> out with the agenda, even though it has been circulated widely <br /> outside the group. <br /> Anybody have any ideas? Do we send them a note asking those <br /> members who haven't read the note to contact someone on <br /> committee or staff who has it so they can be prepared to vote? <br /> Does anybody on staff still have it? <br /> From: LINDSTROM Dan <br /> To: CHOUINARD Lauren D; JENNINGS Carrie A; BECK Marjorie B <br /> Subject: Scobert Park AC- -12/17 Meeting Minutes <br /> Date: Thursday, December 19, 1996 1:12PM <br /> < <File Attachment: SCODAC17.126> > <br /> Page 2 <br />