New Search
HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: BECK Marjorie B <br /> To: CHOUINARD Lauren D <br /> Cc: JENNINGS Carrie A; HAMMITT Bob <br /> Subject: RE: Scobert Park Ad. Com. Minutes 12/7 Meeting <br /> Date: Friday, January 10, 1997 9:01 AM <br /> OK, let's go w /Lauren's suggestion to not put anything in the packet. mb <br /> From: CHOUINARD Lauren D <br /> To: BECK Marjorie B <br /> Cc: JENNINGS Carrie A; HAMMITT Bob <br /> Subject: RE: Scobert Park Ad. Com. Minutes 12/7 Meeting <br /> Date: Thursday, January 09, 1997 4:40PM <br /> I connected with Rich at the end of the meeting and he said he <br /> would pass on the assignments to Tom. I know that Bob Hammitt <br /> has talked to Dick Morgan about having Tim Rhay do a 3 minute <br /> version of the park ranger concept (Tim was the person Bob <br /> Emmons was referring to). I would prefer not sending them <br /> anything in their packet about a process for dealing with the <br /> Musslewhite issue. I will get them through it swiftly at the <br /> beginning of the meeting and we will either be done with it or <br /> we will have a vote that goes to the dept directors for their <br /> final decision and we will move on. Sit back and be <br /> comfy...you took the brunt of this issue in the last meeting <br /> and it's mine turn to leap into the fire. LC. <br /> From: BECK Marjorie B <br /> To: LINDSTROM Dan; CHOUINARD Lauren D; JENNINGS Carrie A <br /> Cc: RIKHOFF Greg S; MORGAN Dick A; HAMMITT Bob; BREMER Richard B <br /> Subject: RE: Scobert Park Ad. Com. Minutes 12/7 Meeting <br /> Date: Thursday, January 09, 1997 10:06AM <br /> Priority: High <br /> Here's all the things I can think of that we need to take care <br /> of for next Tuesday's meeting: <br /> Minutes: I've read & edited mine & sent on to Lauren for review. <br /> Here are my responses to Dan's "Not Part of Minutes" notes: <br /> 1) Missed meetings: Susan Detroy has resigned, so we don't <br /> need to worry about notifying her. We do need to notify Carol <br /> and Jayme they can't miss next week's meeting. I suggest a <br /> phone call (preferred) or a note in their agenda packet. <br /> 2) Replacements: With only three more scheduled meetings, I <br /> wouldn't recommend bringing in a replacement now. <br /> 3) Committee's ability to remove members: DAN, WHY DO YOU <br /> ALWAYS BRING UP THESE DIFFICULT QUESTIONS ? ?? Actually, the <br /> same thing occurred to me. I suggest we just dodge it if it <br /> comes up by saying the department directors expect their <br /> committees to adopt groundrules governing attendance, to <br /> ensure full committee participation, and if a member can't <br /> meet an attendance groundrule the groundrule can be <br /> automatically invoked without referring the decision to the <br /> directors. I haven't actually checked this out with Dave, but <br /> I'II bet he'd say yes. Think that'll fly? <br /> Membership: <br /> Page 1 <br />