Santa Clara - McDougal Trade (Failed)

New Search

• TABLE 40V The impact on the schools, crossing the urban growth boundary. If you do it for one you'll have to do it for others. 97403 It is important to preserve the current urban growth boundary and minimize the size of classrooms. 97404 900 houses. They are crazy if they think the roads or schools will accommodate that. It would depend on the infrastructure and what the builder was going to put into it. I can see the development going in and then the taxpayers have to build a new school. I think it's too much stress on the Santa Clara area. If they don't change the school boundary, it would be too much on the school and improvements would have to be made to River Road. Mostly traffic, which would affect me a lot, and we need to save the farmland. Oh, and the schools are crowded enough. I wouldn't want increased traffic, increased school size and I want to preserve the farms. Traffic and schools mostly. We don't need any more traffic. How are those people from the 900 homes going to get anywhere? Traffic congestion, increase in student population that couldn't be accommodated effectively, excluding of more homes being built to preserve land. Traffic problems, overcrowding of schools. Possibility of annexing. The more people and kids, no school funding and road upkeep...that's where the money should go, the schools aren't sufficient for 900 homes I don't like moving the boundary line, pressure on infrastructure and schools. The need to upgrade Emerald Park. We would be served adequately with that. We have Aubrey Park which can be expanded and used more. Too much traffic congestion, and larger class sizes. Annexation issue 97401 I think that there is absolutely no need to move the boundaries at this point. The Santa Clara area is already a mess and I think need less housing for less devastation to traffic and schools. 97404 The city of Eugene already owns the streets and most of the shopping mall so they have to put in a fire station - this is leading to annexation and I'm against it If it has anything to do with the city of Eugene, I'm against it. We 've been fighting annexation for years. If this is going to be city land, I'm concerned about the tax base - I don't want to be annexed. 1 don't trust anything the city of Eugene does when it comes to building and working with developers. I don't want to be annexed. 1 don't trust the City of Eugene and what they're going to do next. Against annexation - they are doing it piecemeal and this is just another example.