New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Diversity Expectations
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
POS Director
>
Diversity Expectations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 11:26:35 AM
Creation date
7/10/2014 11:26:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
880 8 4 Interdepartmental Cooperation: <br /> In general this is pretty good however...as a five year City employee I've learned who the people <br /> are to go to for help and assistance and who the people are to avoid. There are dead spots in the <br /> organization where there is simply NOT a helpful, service oriented attitude or spirit of cooperation <br /> at the other end of the phone. If I behaved the way some departmental /division staff respond to <br /> requests for assistance I would expect to have my supervisor make it a performance issue. <br /> Executive Mangers: _ <br /> It seems as if the Executive Managers are a management team in search of a mission statement. <br /> They appear to be a well meaning, hard working, dedicated group. I suppose that their job is to <br /> look out for their own department but I don't have the feeling that they thin about (or even <br /> particularly care about) the entire organization. Additionally while the relationship between staff <br /> and council has always been a mixed one I think that the Execs and the City Manager need to <br /> develop some backbone when it comes to what is acceptable behavior by Councilors toward staff. <br /> As an AFSCME employee if I was treated the way that some exempt staff are treated by council <br /> I'd grieve it in a heart beat. This is not a comment on disagreements about policy or procedure but <br /> about common courtesy and treating a fellow human being with respect. If the Managers want us <br /> as employees to be held to a higher standard in our interpersonal relationships (inside and outside <br /> the organization) they need to start at the top. As leaders they need to stand up for staff who are <br /> put into much too awkward and vulnerable a position to do it themselves. The Execs need to lead <br /> by example. <br /> The City Diversity Effort: <br /> Race is important. But it IS NOT the only facet of diversity. Until this organization takes <br /> seriously issues such as class, sexism, sexual orientation, and diversity of thought and opinion we <br /> will not fundamentally change the organizational culture. Class - we are a hierarchical <br /> organization and yet the divisions between employees who have traditionally "working class" jobs <br /> and "middle class" jobs; between "college educated" and "uneducated" employees is vast. The way <br /> these employees are viewed, treated and valued within the organization is a mirror of the class <br /> divisions within our society, whose existence we deny. Sexism - we have yet to have an honest <br /> discussion about sexism or gender discrimination within the organization. We are comfortable <br /> talking about "women in non - traditional roles" but we do not discuss the salary schedules of the <br /> jobs which have been traditionally held by women and undervalued by society. It seems as if the <br /> Administrative Aide classification and the Office Supervisor Classification have been set aside for <br /> women. Why is there only 1 Admin Aide IV in the entire organization who is not a confidential <br /> exempt? Although there are a number of women Management Analysts how many of them have <br /> promoted up through the ranks (for additional information see my comments on "class" above)? Sit <br /> in on many management team meetings with the Divisions and watch the female Office <br /> Supervisors have to fight to be taken as seriously as their male section manager counterparts. <br /> Sexual Orientation - We have become more comfortable (not comfortable, but more comfortable) <br /> with issues of orientation in the organization - as long as they involve lesbians. Look at how <br /> many women are "out" as lesbian in the organization and compare that to the number of men who <br /> are "out" as gay. Why do you think that is? You can not kid yourself and say there is nothing going <br /> on. For whatever reason the lesbians who are out in the organization feel safer being out than the <br /> gay men do. Diversity of thought and opinion - We talk a good game but there is a fairly narrow <br /> area that is considered to be "appropriate ". Just because we work for the City doesn't mean we <br /> should have to stop thinking or trying to change the world. There is the "party line" which is ok to <br /> tout and discuss at length and there are "non - conforming" opinions which are given pretty short <br /> shrift. There doesn't seem to be a real desire to hear views which are different, challenging, or <br /> even radical. We never talk anymore... <br /> 21 8 4 The City of Eugene could do more for the public by letting the public know about the changes that <br /> may come up. Keeping Eugene clean and green and feel safe. We are doing a great job, but how <br /> can we do better. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.