hours) per unit of output or outcome. Examples include the resources — may be involved in changing the way <br /> following: agencies operate. Moreover, the use of performance <br /> measures may be perceived negatively by agencies who <br /> • Expenditures per 5100,000 of property protected worry about being held to performance standards that, in <br /> (Fire ) the case of outcome measures, may not be within their <br /> • Employee hours per crime solved (Police Services) direct control. <br /> • Number of to case - actions processed per <br /> worker (Publi stance) Managers' resistance can be overcome to a large extent <br /> • urred subsid per n cr Transit) by encouraging their participation in setting goals and <br /> y P g� performance measures, and ensuring that performance <br /> measures are used in agency decisions. Including <br /> These measures are used to determine productivity trends in qualitative information along with performance data can <br /> the provision of public programs and services. They are also help to alleviate resistance by providing departments with <br /> used to provide an indication of the cost-effectiveness of a an opportunity to explain deviations from program or <br /> program. service output or outcome targets. Finally, ongoing <br /> refinement of measures is necessary to instill confidence <br /> that appropriate measures will be used in policy and <br /> Obstacles to Measuring Performance decision making activities. (Glaser, 1991] <br /> Developing meaningful performance measures in the Outconte Measurement Issues. If resources are <br /> public sector is a complex task. Governments must to be allocated based on program results, reliable <br /> devise solutions to problems related to data organization, outcome data must be collected. Identifying, - <br /> resistance by managers and staff, and measuring program establishing, and evaluating indicators on program <br /> outcomes. Some of these issues can potentially be outcomes has been particularly difficult for state and <br /> addressed over time as jurisdictions gain more experience local governments. Often, there is no agreement among <br /> with setting performance goals and measuring results; various stakeholders as to what a program is trying to <br /> others are likely to be more intractable. achieve. For example, in providing a city bus service, <br /> operating a reliable, on -time service may be perceived as an <br /> Data Organization. Monitoring and reporting important objective. In order to preserve sufficient capital <br /> performance requires that the resources needed to funding to replace older, less reliable buses, the program <br /> provide a program or service be linked with its outputs or administrator may propose as a goal maintaining the growth <br /> outcomes, hence, data must be collected, organized, and in operating expenses at or below the rate of inflation. This <br /> analyzed by "cost center." Many jurisdictions lack cost objective, however, can be at odds with other desirable <br /> reliable cost and program data, or do not have budgeting and goals, e.g., to provide comprehensive service to assure that <br /> accounting systems set up to keep track of data in this low - income, elderly, or other key constituents are adequately <br /> manner. Agencies that administer several pograms may served. Unless consensus can be achieved on the primary <br /> have difficulty in deciding how to allocate commonly used goals of a program, there is likely to be ambiguity in <br /> resources (e.g., administrative overhead) to single programs. interpreting performance outcome data. • - <br /> Technological advances have made it easier to organize <br /> programs based on cost •accounting principles; A second problem with outcome measures is that <br /> nevertheless, initial attempts to do this by governments governments are often unable to establish conclusive links <br /> can still be very time - consuming and costly. In between a particular set of benefits and program activities. <br /> instituting a performance measurement system, An important objective of a police department is to prevent <br /> governments will need to strike an appropriate. balance crime, and policy makers may decide to allocate resources to <br /> between the benefits of a high - quality performance increase the number of patrol hours. However, they may also <br /> measurement system and the costs of data collection and provide resources to increase the effectiveness of drug <br /> organization so that performance measurement does not education programs, which also affects crime. If fewer <br /> become a drain on organizational resources. criminal activities are reported in the community, policy <br /> makers may find it difficult to determine which program is <br /> Resistance by Managers and Staff. Performance contributing to the desired outcome. <br /> measurement may also be resisted by program managers <br /> and staff. In agencies where policy or management A final problem is that measuring outcomes entails more of a - <br /> decisions are not tied directly to program goals and jurisdiction's resources. Governments find it easier to <br /> results, significant costs -- both in time and financial measure inputs and outputs, since they control how resources <br /> 4 <br />