Review Draft Eastern Gateway Wetland Restoration Site -- Annual Report <br /> Table _. Plant Species in Macroplot #3 Recorded at a Frequency of Greater than 50 %. <br /> i <br /> , Species. Name Wetland Planted? Native or Frequency ( %) in ' <br /> Indicator Status Introduced I m Quadrats <br /> Juncus bufonius FACW N Native 96.7 <br /> Deschampsia cespitosa FACW Y Native 91.7 <br /> Vicia tetrasperma NOL' N Introduced 86.7 <br /> Carex spp. OBL -FACW Y Native 81.7 <br /> Holcus lanatus FAC N Introduced 80.0 <br /> Daucus carota NOL' N Introduced ' 78.3 <br /> Geranium dissectum NOL' N Introduced 76.7 <br /> Rubus discolor FACU N Introduced 71.7 <br /> Myosotis discolor FACW N Introduced 63.3 <br /> Trifolium dubium ■OL'. N Introduced 61.7 <br /> Dipsacus sylvestris FAC N Introduced 60.0 <br /> Lolium perenne FACU N Introduced 58.3 <br /> Lotus purshianus NOL' Y Native 56.7 <br /> Cirsium arvense . FACU+ N Introduced 56.7 <br /> Boisduvalia densiflora FACW- Y - Native 55.0 <br /> Chrysanthemum <br /> leucanthemum NOL' N Introduced 55.0 <br /> Agrostis exarata FACW Y Native 53.3 <br /> Cerastium viscosum NOL' ' N Introduced 50.0 <br /> Beckmannia syzigachne OBL Y Native 50.0 <br /> ' Species not given an indicator status by Reed (1988) or in updates; either an upland species <br /> or wetland species still in need of a rating. <br /> c :1 user l dall wrt l m itigati l annrpt2. wpd <br /> L' — <br /> 1 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Page 20 <br />