New Search
MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> From: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> To: LONG Jack E; MEDLIN Johnny R; WALCH Therese; BINGHAM Tim S <br /> Subject: erosion mtg today FW: Rules- related info <br /> Date: Thursday, October 24, 1996 11:26AM <br /> If you get a chance to cruise through the issues today before we meet that would be great. Also, if you <br /> have other issues that we need to consider. <br /> I hope we can come to a consensus on what needs to be adjusted in the rules based on all the comments <br /> we have received since our last outreach on the rules in july /august. <br /> see ya at 4, first floor 858 pearl <br /> me <br /> From: WALCH Therese <br /> To: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Subject: Rules- related info <br /> Date: Thursday, October 17, 1996 12:23PM <br /> This is what I got out of the lunch work - session yesterday, which we need to address in our discussions <br /> and maybe in the rules (plus things you asked me to add): <br /> 1.turnaround time for plan review /permitting <br /> 2.seasonal changes should be reflected somehow, since efforts will be greater during the wet season. <br /> 3.erosion control monitoring to be done for a period of time (two years ?) after the construction is <br /> complete. <br /> 4.anticipated permit fees should reflect the adopted ordinance, rather than the original plan which would <br /> have required more effort from personnel to implement. <br /> 5.what effect has the "revised" ordinance (vs. originally proposed one) had on the expected number of <br /> employees to implement the program? <br /> 6.protection of neighboring property <br /> 7.council wants to review the draft rules; at a worksession was recommended. <br /> 8.self funded program - what about when development slows down and there is no permit revenue coming <br /> in? <br /> 9. clarify our fees relative to Portland (did Boles still have a question about this ?). <br /> 10. Springfield CE comments <br /> 11. certified professional - Ann C.. <br /> 12. definition of "maximum extent practicable" <br /> #10 expanded <br /> I am submitting the following recommendations for revision to the proposed Erosion Control <br /> Administrative Rule. <br /> R- 6.645 -B <br /> I propose that the list of "Certified Professionals" be amended to change Engineer <br /> to Civil Engineer, that Land Surveyor and Geologist be added to the list, and <br /> that Landscape Architect be eliminated from the list. <br /> I propose adding "fuel, oil and hydraulic fluids" specifically to the list of hazardous <br /> substances which is shown in paragraph eight, "Construction related materials ". <br /> Add "vehicular activity" to the list of land altering activities under paragraph 14, <br /> "disturbed areas ". <br /> R- 6.645 -C <br /> 2.2 An information packet could be included with all building permits. <br /> 3.1 The definition of re- opening a street to traffic could be interpreted so <br /> broadly as to exempt most construction activity from compliance. For example, <br /> I "reopen a street to traffic" by instructing a backhoe operator to move off the <br /> Page 1 <br />