• <br /> • Better able to control the pollutant at its source; prevention <br /> • Allows us to optimize what resources we have ; will cause private sector to test / improve <br /> existing models <br /> • Allows much more targeted pollution control; targeting of source problems <br /> Disadvantages: <br /> • <br /> • Solution to pollution is dilution <br /> PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE /AWARENESS /INVOLVEMENT <br /> Management Guideline - Planning decisions should encourage public participation for <br /> fostering community acceptance and long -term involvement. <br /> Advantages: <br /> • <br /> • Might put water pollution controls closer to the people, which would increase public <br /> awareness re: H quality/quantity <br /> • Get development community more involved in creating standards <br /> • In long term private approach can foster more of a community sense, e.g. more ownership, <br /> watchdog role <br /> • Benefit private consultants who want to assist in development of on -site controls <br /> Disadvantages: <br /> • Negative impact on how development friendly Eugene is; could dissuade companies from <br /> locating here <br /> • Will face an uphill battle placing standards for new designs /approaches with which people <br /> are not familiar and have no training <br /> • Change-flavor of city's enforcement and relationship to develop.community <br /> LIABILITY <br /> Management Guideline - Planning decisions should minimize liability risks to the organization <br /> and private properly owners. <br /> Advantages: — <br /> • Relieve city of liability in event system doesn't work as designed <br /> • Would relieve the city from an injury or property damage liability <br /> • PIC would continue to stay busy <br /> A -7 <br />