New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Storm Sewer System
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Stormwater
>
Storm Sewer System
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 3:10:14 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 3:09:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
plans. A Citizen's Advisory Committee will oversee each of these actions, with special <br /> neighborhood planning teams assisting with individual basin plans. Refer to Appendix H. <br /> Internal Organizational Needs /Interface: <br /> This exercise identified the coordination needs of the organization for addressing implementation <br /> requirements. Significant work is needed to create the necessary administrative processes, <br /> procedures, and information systems for designing, building, monitoring, maintaining, and <br /> enforcing new development standards. Refer to Appendix I. <br /> V. RESULTS OF SCOPING SESSION I (June 30, 1994). <br /> There were 24 participants at the scoping session, including 2 representatives from DEQ. <br /> Primary objectives of the session were to brainstorm advantages and disadvantages of private <br /> stormwater systems, and to assess the pros and cons of three implementation strategies: <br /> mandatory, voluntary, and incentive. The results of this session would be used at Scoping <br /> Session II to help identify and define criteria for determining the circumstances for which <br /> private stormwater systems would be appropriate. Two facilitators were used to complete both <br /> exercises. <br /> A. Advantages /Disadvantages. The 24 participants convened as a large group. A round - <br /> robin, brainstorm process was used to solicit responses. In this process, each participant is <br /> asked to provide one statement, with no discussion from the rest of the group unless agreed to <br /> by the individual giving the response. The group identified and recorded 41 advantages and 68 <br /> disadvantages. <br /> Following the scoping session, the water resources team reviewed and grouped the advantages <br /> and disadvantages into categories reflecting common concerns. The comments and the categories <br /> suggest theft are two levels of concern: 1) system or basin level, sand 2) site level. The basin <br /> level comments are concerned with overall feasibility, practicability, and cost - effectiveness to <br /> the community and organization. For example, is it cost effective to install controls in a basin <br /> that is 95 % built -out versus a basin that is partially built -out? The site level comments are <br /> concerned with the suitability of a site's physical characteristics for providing on -site controls <br /> (size, soils, slopes, natural resources), and whether the controls would be maintained. Next, the <br /> team developed management guidelines for each category. These guidelines are intended to <br /> assist in develaping more specific criteria for determining private system suitability_, <br /> B. Implementation Strategies. The same round -robin process was used for this exercise; <br /> however, due to time limitations, the group only addressed the incentives portion of the three <br /> implementation strategies. 33 comments were recorded. There was no additional work on the <br /> incentives. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.