Medians Medians are proposed on only one street type; the Residential Boulevard. This street <br /> type is not currently recognized in the City's Zoning Code. It is expected that, if the boulevard- <br /> type street is approved as a classification, that it will be infrequently used - The Standards for <br /> medians on boulevard streets includes a standard for landscaping of medians, rather than paving. <br /> Specific discussion about maintenance issues resulting from this new standard will be included in <br /> the draft Local Street Plan. <br /> Cul -de -sacs While cul -de -sacs are not prohibited in the draft LSP, proposed standards for street <br /> connectivity will greatly reduce their numbers in future developments. Proposals in the LSP call <br /> for maximum street lengths of 600' instead of the existing 1200', requires more frequent <br /> connections to adjacent streets, and requires more stub streets to adjacent undeveloped property. <br /> The net result of the connectivity standards, should they be adopted, will be to encourage greater <br /> dispersal of locally- generated traffic by creating more route options. It should be noted, <br /> however, that reduction in the numbers of cul -de -sac and dead -end streets in favor of improved <br /> connectivity, could result in relatively more area devoted to street surface. Additional analysis <br /> will be done on this subject prior to public hearings on the plan. <br /> Access to Property This issue is not addressed in the LSP; driveway design as it relates to <br /> stormwater controls is an "on- site" issue. <br /> Preserve Natural Topographic Features Planing principle #6 indicates that "Local street design <br /> should be responsive to topography and other natural features ". Specific recommendations <br /> affecting topography include proposals to reduce maximum grade from 20% to 15 %, to allow <br /> cul -de -sac streets where topographic or natural feature constraints would limit feasibility of <br /> through street connections, and to allow sidewalks on one side of the street if topographic <br /> constraints are apparent. <br /> The criteria for layout of streets on the Proposed Local Street Plan Map included directions to the - <br /> engineering consultant who laid out the conceptual street alignments, to follow contour benches <br /> in hillside areas, and avoid stream crossings and natural feature disturbance to the greatest extent <br /> possible. We believe that the criteria was met. <br /> Select Appropriate Storm Drainage and Treatment Facilities The Local Street Plan will include <br /> a discussion of stormwater /street design coordination issues. The draft plan will include <br /> recommendations for use of inverted curbs in alleys (in conjunction with allowance for an <br /> asphalt paving standard rather than a concrete paving standard), and on local streets with low <br /> traffic volumes. Use of inverted curbs are likely to be limited to "access lane" classifications. <br /> — <br /> Design options involving the use of grassy swales on lower -order streets are not inconsistent <br /> with proposals in the Local Street Plan. Right -of -way widths proposed in the draft LSP would <br /> need to be increased significantly, in some cases, if grassy swales were included in certain street <br /> designs. Given that the DAC has not yet finalized its design standards recommendations, the <br /> LSP staff team feels that it would be inappropriate for the street plan to assume that wider right - <br /> of -way widths are necessary at this time. Amendments to ROW width standards will be _ <br /> �✓ necessary if grassy swales are ultimately accepted as a drainage design technique. <br /> • <br />