New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Storm Sewer System
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Stormwater
>
Storm Sewer System
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 3:10:14 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 3:09:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8. Low LIABILITY. <br /> Current philosophy with the attorneys representing the city seems to be to place as much <br /> responsibility on the property owner as possible know fully that the city will get named in any <br /> lawsuit anyway. This argument supports the on -site facility with code language which states the <br /> occupant being responsible. <br /> Personally, I believe the City gets hung up on the argument of liability exposure too much. We <br /> expend much time an effort to reduce our level of exposure but don't spend much time in talking <br /> about what a reasonable level of exposure might be. As a policy we are unwilling to publicly <br /> take a risk. <br /> A good example is the public controversy we went through with the development of the Urban <br /> Forest Management Plan. There is a high degree of public desire to retain older mature trees. <br /> However, these are the very trees which cause the highest liability due to their bing close or into <br /> decline and will soon (0 to 5 years) start dropping limbs. The city takes the posture that we want <br /> the neighborhood values contributed by these trees and have done much to insist that we do the <br /> maintenance, but then we also move fairly quickly to cause a trees removal or to point at the <br /> abutting property owner as responsible for the trees maintenance if a lost limb causes property <br /> damage or worse. <br /> 9. POLITICALLY /INSTITUTIONALLYACCEPTABLE. <br /> I believe the on -site systems would meet the greatest level of acceptance by the general public <br /> for the reasons stated elsewhere herein. <br /> The business /development community likely would see this picture differently. <br /> 10. EQUITABLE. <br /> Keeping the public agencies involvement at a minimum and the responsibilities for management <br /> and maintenance as close as possible to the place the problem occurs is the most equitable. <br /> 11. EASY TO INSPECT/ENFORCE. <br /> A regional system maintained by the governing body is the easiest to inspect. With good policies <br /> and maintenance practices the maintenance personnel responsible perform their own inspection <br /> on an on -going basis as a part of their normal activities. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.