New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Trees & Tree Commission
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
Trees & Tree Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 2:24:44 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 2:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
knowing they could not do so after annexation. It was feared that others may <br /> follow the example. <br /> The commission agreed to write a letter to the City Council and the County <br /> Commissioners recommending that they address the issue of tree cutting within <br /> the urban growth boundary. <br /> III. CITY COUNCIL MEETING PREPARATION <br /> Mr. Ahlijian briefly reviewed the commission's objectives towards organizing <br /> itself for its meeting with the City Council. Mr. Post explained that the <br /> council session would last two hours, of which approximately 90 minutes would <br /> be available for the commission. He noted that written information would <br /> need to be submitted by noon on Friday, April 13, before the Wednesday, April <br /> 18, meeting. He added that Ms. Bascom requested that he submit Tree Commis- <br /> sion information for the councilors' packets each week until the meeting <br /> week. He mentioned that the submittal would include the Trees for Eugene <br /> brochure, the Urban Forest Report, the one -page flier on the Arbor Day Cele- <br /> bration at Patterson School, and other items. <br /> Regarding presentation format, Mr. Ahlijian suggested that each member raise <br /> a specific topic before the councilors and gave examples of possible sub- <br /> jects. He felt this format would help acquaint the council with the commis- <br /> sion. The commission agreed to work with this format. Topics raised by the <br /> commission should be within the scope of the commission's work plan. <br /> ( In response to questions, Mr. Ahlijian said an introduction of the commis- <br /> sion's activities and plans would be included. He believed the topics should <br /> pertain to the top three action priorities. He added that the commission <br /> should inform the council that it is not opposed to tree cutting, but that it <br /> supports appropriate removal. <br /> Ms. Sirnio felt the commission should inform the council of its short -term <br /> goals. Mr. Ahlijian noted that the presentation should emphasize what the <br /> commission is willing to do, and not just what it wants. He felt that it was <br /> important that the council know the Tree Commission supports and is willing <br /> to work toward cooperation on urban forest issues among the Public Works <br /> Department, the Planning and Development Department, the utility companies, <br /> and the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. Mr. Medlin added <br /> that it was also important to show how the commission would resolve conflicts <br /> with those organizations. <br /> In response to a question about budget discussion, it was noted that at the <br /> March 15 meeting, the commission decided that it would be prudent not to <br /> refer to budget matters and that the commission was not prepared to relate <br /> such information. <br /> Mr. Friedkin said he would like to prepare a slide presentation. Ms. Sirnio <br /> said she would speak on urban vegetation and urban planning issues. Mr. Lum <br /> ( MINUTES - -Tree Commission March 29, 1990 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.