New Search
MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: DECEMBER 13. 1994 <br /> TO: RICHARD A. MORGAN <br /> FROM: ADRIAN STANSFIELD <br /> SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL ON ROYAL <br /> On the Southeast corner of Royal and Hughes, there is a plum tree located <br /> inside a fenced yard that is, in fact, in the right -of -way. Earlier this year <br /> we were requested to clear a sign that was obscured by foliage from the tree. <br /> The the pedptheysign. the that goodvhealtonly <br /> c l sign. <br /> with the sidewalk project that is happening there, the property owner is <br /> again saying "take it out" to Pat Bayes, the engineer in charge of the <br /> project. Pat told me the property owner wants the city to take it out and for <br /> it not to be a part of the project cost. <br /> My understanding on the entire Royal sidewalk project is that the issue of <br /> trees was covered and settled before it started. Now I seem to be getting <br /> requests from property owners and questions from Pat Bayes regarding our <br /> availability to do the removals. My response to date has been, No, we will <br /> not remove the trees. <br /> If we are seen removing one of the trees out there, for whatever reason, I am <br /> sure we will be deluged with calls to take all the others out as well and I <br /> cannot afford to have the crews out there for the time it would take to do it. <br /> If these trees were addressed in the original agreement or contract, I feel we <br /> should stick with the original plan, unless there is something I am not seeing <br /> or don't know. <br /> Let me know what you think. <br /> rcu k" o r p ,,.- 1 Cdr /16 h tt 4.f .63 tN t 1 w t. <br /> f� ;4.-4.4 �� /-Lt' c %;" <br /> "4, � p ro P c: (,,.�i (ct. vJ •M <br /> w t"..: Icr — f r._.t /44^n ( .1 paw 1 cuv <br /> 64; <br /> 1 6 2.;A-1) <br /> :V 0 ,44444 1) <br /> ; "el (h €� p l1r ) <br /> SI Log) 0, c <br />