New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
General Trees
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
General Trees
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 1:41:58 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 1:41:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
will your shop be taking enforcement action based on the <br /> number of trees cut? Our enforcement powers are limited to a • <br /> daily civil penalty. Not very effective for this type of <br /> violation! Dick is out all this week. thanks mm <br /> From: GASSMAN Dick L <br /> To: MILLER Marsha A; MCKERROW Mike J <br /> Subject: FW: Hunter's Glen <br /> Date: Sunday, July 21, 1996 1:38PM <br /> Here is the latest on the Hunter's Glen situation. This has <br /> the possibility of mushrooming into a gigantic controversy <br /> within the City given that PWM, Planning, and us all have a <br /> hand in the pie, the relative responsibilities are not clear, <br /> and there are City Council people watching. <br /> Mike, I think we need to set up some arrangement with PWM and <br /> Planning for them to notify us when a tree cutting plan has <br /> been approved, and then, of course, we need to have a copy of <br /> the plan. In fact, as much as I hate to suggest this, it <br /> might more sense, and be simpler in the long run, if PWM and <br /> LUMS were the ones who approve tree cutting plans in PUDs <br /> rather than PWM and Planning. At least then we would know <br /> when a plan was approved, we would know the details, and we <br /> would have a copy of the approved plan so that we didn't have <br /> to spend so much time tracking all of this down when we got a <br /> complaint. Think about it. <br /> From: HUDZIKIEWICZ Joe <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R; JACOBSON Jerry P <br /> Cc: LYLE Les A; GASSMAN Dick L <br /> Subject: RE: Hunter's Glen <br /> Date: Friday, July 19, 1996 5:01 PM <br /> Jerry, you are correct, but the trees that have been removed <br /> far exceed those shown on the PUD plans. All trees not within <br /> designated conservation areas have been removed, plus many in <br /> utility easements. I believe PUD requires tree cutting plan <br /> approved by planning subsequent to final PUD approval. <br /> From: JACOBSON Jerry P <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R; HUDZIKIEWICZ Joe <br /> Cc: LYLE Les A; GASSMAN Dick L <br /> Subject: RE: Hunter's Glen <br /> Date: Friday, July 19, 1996 4:18PM <br /> I am not sure what trees have been removed, but the final PUD <br /> did have approval for removal of some trees. I assume that <br /> the trees removed are not those granted previous approval in <br /> the PUD. <br /> From: HUDZIKIEWICZ Joe <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Cc: LYLE Les A; JACOBSON Jerry P; GASSMAN Dick L <br /> Subject: RE: Hunter's Glen <br /> Date: Friday, July 19, 1996 1:03PM <br /> Thanks for the information. The conditions of the PUD require <br /> that any tree cutting plan be approved by the Planning <br /> Division and the Urban Forester. If you receive any plans, <br /> they should be referred to planning for approval. Will keep <br /> you informed. <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.