New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
1994 Tree Ordinance
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
1994 Tree Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 10:00:52 AM
Creation date
7/9/2014 10:00:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hammitt, Bob <br /> From: Medlin, Johnny <br /> To: Norris, Linda <br /> Cc: Andersen, Chris; Hammitt, Bob; Klein, Glenn (RIS1) <br /> Subject: Benchmark Northwest Tree Felling on Dillard Road <br /> Date: Tuesday, February 01, 1994 11:14AM <br /> Hi Linda, <br /> This is preliminary from Jens Schmidt of the City Attorney's Office but since it is also time sensitive I thought I'd <br /> let you know what was happening. <br /> From our meeting of last week the question of impact of the alleged illegal tree removal onto the ongoing PUD <br /> application was researched and there was nothing found that ties the two together. Therefore, it looks like the <br /> PUD approval can't be held while this issue is being resolved. <br /> The issue of the stop work order is basically the same. As long as they comply with the clarifications of the <br /> permit provisions we don't have anything that justifies our not giving them the go -ahead to resume work under <br /> the permit. They still maintain that the earlier transgression was a misunderstanding and that they have given <br /> every verbal and written agreements that they will honor our interpretations of the permit from this point forward. <br /> We received a letter from them last week stating that they feel they have met all the conditions stated in my <br /> earlier letter to them that needed to be met to have the stop work order lifted. I agree that they have. <br /> They are stating that meeting the conditions was at a cost to them of $5,000. They ask that the City either lift the <br /> stop work order by Feb. 1st. or they feel they should would be liable for the $5,000 spent to comply with the <br /> conditions we set. <br /> Jeans will be getting back to me early this afternoon and says his recommendation will likely be to lift the stop <br /> work order. I would appreciate your thoughts on this prior to me doing so. If we are going to lift it, doing so by <br /> their Feb. 1st date would close one possibility for them to have a possibly valid counter- claim. While I think the <br /> $5,000 figure to be high, it would not be simple to contest. <br /> Thanks Johnny <br /> Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.