Under the current code, the narrowest street that can be built is a 28' street that allows for parking <br /> on both sides. The code does not reflect the variety of conditions that actually exist in large and <br /> small -scale development and infill projects. For example, the code requires the same pavement <br /> width (28') for a street serving 70 homes (which could generate as many as 700 vehicle trips per <br /> day) as it does for a cul-de -sac street serving 6 -10 homes where traffic volumes are negligible. <br /> In addition, the current code does not allow for flexibility in dealing with on -street parking <br /> demands. The current code does not allow for design options for street types with no on -street <br /> parking, congregate guest parking, or parking on one side of the street. • <br /> Residential Collectors: In residential areas, certain streets function as residential collectors <br /> These streets enable moderate amounts of traffic to move between local streets and the major <br /> street network (collector and arterial streets). Residential collectors typically have more traffic <br /> than most local streets. The current code requires collectors in residential areas to be designed <br /> within a 60' right -of -way and to be designed with striped bike lanes. <br /> Because residential collectors are part of the residential street system, this plan recommends a <br /> design treatment for residential collectors that is more compatible with the residential <br /> environment and less like the designs for major streets. Bicycles share the street with <br /> automobiles on residential collectors, design speeds are lowered from 35 mph to 25 mph, and <br /> options for no- parking, parking on one side, and parking on both sides of the street are provided. <br /> A new residential collector street type (Residential Boulevard) is also proposed. The residential <br /> boulevard is a collector street type with a landscaped center median separating vehicle travel <br /> lanes. While the boulevard is likely to be infrequently used, it provides a design option which <br /> could create a distinctive street character to enhance neighborhood identity, especially when used <br /> in conjunction with alley access to parcels fronting on the boulevard. <br /> * *INSERT PHOTO ** <br /> Alleys: In older parts of the city, alleys were planned or constructed to provide an alternative <br /> vehicular access to homes. In the past 50 years, however, few alleys have been built. While <br /> alleys are allowed in the current zoning code, their construction is not encouraged. Current code <br /> requirements for alleys require wider paving than is necessary for adequate access to properties <br /> and require concrete paving rather than asphalt. While this design standard reduces maintenance <br /> and drainage costs, the initial cost of construction for a secondary access discourages use of <br /> alleys in new developments. This plan proposes a design standard for private alleys that would <br /> reduce initial construction costs by permitting the use of asphalt paving and inverted curbs rather <br /> than concrete paving. (See Figure ). <br /> 29 <br />