New Search
4. In the sixth recital, in the second line, delete "beneath <br /> overhead power lines ", and in the third line, delete <br /> "those ". - <br /> 5. First word in paragraph B -3 should be "once ". <br /> 6. Paragraph B -4 should be two sentences. The first sentence <br /> should end with "work being performed." The second should <br /> begin with "Public information may include . . ." <br /> So much for proofreading. In paragraph B -3, has anyone <br /> thought of having meetings at the City's option, in case some <br /> jobs aren't worth a meeting? <br /> Is paragraph B -4 the end of the draft? What happens after <br /> public notice? What if the public doesn't like the proposal? <br /> Are alternatives identified? By whom? Then who decides which <br /> one to go with? Is there an appeal route? Where? <br /> Who signs this agreement? What are its effective dates? Is <br /> there a termination clause? Review clause? Escape clause? <br /> Santa Claus? (Sorry, I'm getting carried away.) <br /> Wasn't there some talk about the latest and greatest accepted <br /> tree - trimming method? Is this agreement a way to hold EWEB to <br /> that method? <br /> Are there ever cases where the City wants to trim a tree and <br /> there are power lines in or around the tree, where maybe we <br /> ought to be giving advance notice to EWEB? <br /> Back in the recitals we talk about not planting trees that <br /> might interfere with power lines. How about not installing <br /> power lines that might interfere with trees? <br /> This is probably more than you wanted, but these are only <br /> suggestions. Use those that you find helpful. <br /> Glen Potter <br /> From: Medlin, Johnny <br /> To: Potter, Glen; Norris, Linda; Childs, Jan; Daut, Myrnie; <br /> Andersen, Chris; Lyle, Les <br /> ; Reinhard, Dave <br /> Cc: Stansfield, Adrian; Etter, John; Morgan, Dick; Weber, John; Hammitt, Bob; <br /> Staszewski, Jan <br /> Subject: Intergov. Agreement with EWEB on Tree Issues Coordination <br /> Date: Friday, April 01, 1994 2:37PM <br /> Hi, the CITY /EWEB staff task team working on this <br /> intergovernmental agreement has come together on the issues <br /> and completed the attached draft agreement. <br /> < <File Attachment: EWEB.WP> > <br /> I'm sending this draft out for fairly wide review in hopes of <br /> catching anyone who may have an interest. If you receive a <br /> copy and have no interest please ignore, if you know of <br /> someone else on your staff who may be interested please <br /> forward the draft to them. <br /> Please return all comments prior to April 27, 1994. The task <br /> team plans a meeting in the first week of May to discuss any <br /> changes needed brought about through this review and a similar <br /> Page 2 <br />