New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Jan 2008 Results Summary
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
Jan 2008 Results Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2014 2:30:39 PM
Creation date
6/3/2014 2:19:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
April 29, 2008
Document_Number
Road Fund Policy Team
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The following chart sets out four options that demonstrate possible project lists along the continuum of <br />most project certainty to most effective use of dollars spent. The chart assumes an $81 million bond <br />measure, which consists of $6.5 million of projects each year, with inflation. The chart totals are equal to <br />$65 million, which is $6.5 million of project spending each year in today's dollars. For council, we could <br />just show the percentage of bond measure spent for each category. <br />The reconstruct and overlays in the first two lines of the chart would have a list of specific projects that <br />could be committed to. The reconstruct category would be for arterials and collectors only; no local <br />projects would be included. The overlays would be projects that we are fairly certain are needed over the <br />next three to five years, although we would not commit to a specific time period for those overlays. The <br />unallocated category would be about $2 million per year that would be directed towards the most effec- <br />tive use of bond dollars, and would be mainly invested in overlay projects. The staff group agreed that <br />each of these options should be ones that we could live with and support if the council decided to put out <br />a bond measure with these project mixes. <br />The new pavement report is currently being printed, and an updated list of maintenance requirements is <br />included. PWM can provide a list of all streets currently in the backlog and the treatment and cost of the <br />repair. The group did not attempt to pick particular streets to include in each of these options, but that <br />would be the next step in preparation for the council meeting. <br />These options are for discussion at our Wednesday larger group meeting. Once the group decides <br />whether these are the right conceptual options to bring to council, specific project lists can be developed. <br />Option 1 <br />Option 2 <br />Option 3 <br />Option 4 <br />Add Arterial <br />Add Local <br />Most Certain <br />& Collector <br />Street <br />Most Effective <br />Amount in Miffions/Percent of Total <br />Project List <br />Overlays <br />Overlays <br />Use of Dollars <br />Reconstruct Arterial & Collectors <br />$51.5 / 80% <br />$31.5/49% <br />$21.5/33% <br />$6.5/10% <br />Overlays <br />$10/15% <br />$10115% <br />$20/31% <br />$15/23% <br />Overlays Include Local Streets <br />No <br />No <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Bike Paths <br />$3.5/5% <br />$3.5/5% <br />$3.5/5% <br />$3.5/5% <br />Unallocated <br />-- <br />$20/31% <br />$20/31% <br />$40/61% <br />Total <br />$65/100% <br />$65/100% <br />$65/100% <br />$65/100% <br />The reconstruct and overlays in the first two lines of the chart would have a list of specific projects that <br />could be committed to. The reconstruct category would be for arterials and collectors only; no local <br />projects would be included. The overlays would be projects that we are fairly certain are needed over the <br />next three to five years, although we would not commit to a specific time period for those overlays. The <br />unallocated category would be about $2 million per year that would be directed towards the most effec- <br />tive use of bond dollars, and would be mainly invested in overlay projects. The staff group agreed that <br />each of these options should be ones that we could live with and support if the council decided to put out <br />a bond measure with these project mixes. <br />The new pavement report is currently being printed, and an updated list of maintenance requirements is <br />included. PWM can provide a list of all streets currently in the backlog and the treatment and cost of the <br />repair. The group did not attempt to pick particular streets to include in each of these options, but that <br />would be the next step in preparation for the council meeting. <br />These options are for discussion at our Wednesday larger group meeting. Once the group decides <br />whether these are the right conceptual options to bring to council, specific project lists can be developed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.