DAVIS Lori M <br />From: <br />DONAHUE Tammy G <br />Sent: <br />Friday, November 15, 2002 9:45 AM <br />To: <br />MURDOCH Kitty M <br />Cc: <br />DIXON Valerie A; MEDLIN Johnny R; DAVIS Lori M <br />Subject: <br />RE: Hi <br />When you talked with Val she was thinking non - general fund. Seems to me if the money for General Fund has <br />already been factor in the budget (PDDs) that we would want to do a BJE for that and move it to the appropriate <br />Department. I don't think there is a rush, but I do think we should do it. On the non - general fund, I agree we <br />should take the wait and see approach. What do you think? <br />RE: River Road Santa Clara Park District. I left you a voice mail this morning. I talked with Johnny Medlin (he's <br />happy to talk with you if you need him too) this morning. Basically the why is that the contract management and <br />negotiations are being handled by LRCS now. We do not what appropriations showing up in our budget that are not <br />actually ours. Makes more sense for them to be transferred to LRCS. Sounds like both Execs, Angel Jones and <br />Kurt Corey, are on board with this too. We budgeted 115,000 but would transfer the amount that we were billed <br />(approx 117,000) and then LRCS would handle it from there. I need to know if I can do this by BJE only or if it has <br />to go through supplemental. We would like to have this happen immediately as we are sitting on a bill that needs to <br />be paid. We also want to make the transfer in FY03 so that it can be reflected accurately in both PW and LRCS <br />FY04 baselines. <br />Thanks <br />Tammy <br />Let me know how to proceed. � Nwm � �� �` <br />� pq� 02- wlr y• p ►u 011-gb20 <br />�W w %euje_ . (ot I3rl <br />— Original Message--- - <br />From: MURDOCH Kitty M <br />Sent: Tuesday, 12 November, 2002 7:30 PM <br />To: DONAHUE Tammy G <br />Cc: PETRY Jeff T; PARNESS Nikki M <br />Subject: Hi <br />Fyoq F <br />I didn't get a chance to call you today. You called a couple of times on Friday with questions. The first question was about <br />the FY03 Risk Rate change for PW and PDD. You asked whether baseline adjustments would be (or were) given. When I <br />talked to Val when the error was discovered, she said she didn't think there was a rush to get the FY03 budget adjusted. <br />Her thought was that we would take a wait and see approach, so that if additional baseline authority would be required that <br />we'd ask for it at the end of the year. PDD has been told to put the "extra" appropriation they have in an ASA account and <br />not spend it. I believe your FY04 baseline has been made whole for the difference between the FY03 starting rate (not the <br />adjusted rate) and the FY04 rate, so it shouldn't be an issue in FY04. <br />Your second question was about a baseline adjustment for the River Road Santa Clara park district. I think we'll need to <br />talk on this one, since this is the first I've heard about changing the baseline over to LRCS. Can you tell me why? We'll <br />have to go back to the most recent baseline where it showed up as an adjustment, and figure inflation from that date. Do <br />you have any idea what the actual adjustment should be? Isn't this the thing that required checking the tax rolls every <br />once in a while to get the av for the district, etc.? -- Kitty <br />