River Road PRD Agreements - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

A operational efficiencies through being associated with a much larger organiza- tion. It also seems again to make a promise we may have difficulty keeping. Page 3, Number 1.2: My concern is that this section again make the promise that we will continue to fund as was in the past. Page 3, Number 1.2: Just want to flag that the District appointed "Transition Committee" will have control of how all cash reserves will be spent. What happens if they and the budget committee disagree. If staff disagrees? Page 3, Number 1.4: Just flagging that the "Emerald Park Supervisor" (who now is a city employee ?) has to approve and change in equipment and fixtures at the Park? What level of person is this? Seems excessive authority to me. Page 4, Number 1.6: Here we guarantee that Emerald Park employees will stay at that facility for at least three years. Page 4, Number 1.7: Here we fund a swim and water polo team? And a half -time coach? Page 4, Number 2.1 and Page 5 Number 3: The District appoints a five member transition Committee? They can appoint themselves. They have the authority to determine which programs the city will continue to operate? Page 6, Number 4. Term: This is a four year agreement expiring in June of 1996 or three years of the Districts absorption by the City through annexation. Page 7, Number 9. Again, disagreements are solved through arbitration. GENERAL COMMENTS: Both of these agreements seem to be excessively slanted in the favor of the District.. Perhaps their agreeing to not oppose annexations make this good policy. We "Intergovernmental Agreement" dealing with those three years after the District is absorbed into the City is perhaps the less problematic of the two since its duration is only for three years. We can live through most anything for that length of time. The other agreement which guarantees funding for the next 10 -20 years has me worried.