New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2006 PROS Plan - Legal Appeals
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
POS Director
>
2006 PROS Plan - Legal Appeals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2014 12:14:45 PM
Creation date
5/30/2014 8:48:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Document_Number
2006 PROS Plan Legal Appeals
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PaQe <br />K. Response to Eleventh Assignment of Error ....................... 30 <br />The City did not exceed its planning jurisdiction under the <br />Metro Plan nor did it fail to coordinate with Lane County. <br />1. The PROS Plan is Consistent with the Metro Plan ........... 30 <br />2. The City Properly Coordinated with Lane County ........... 32 <br />V. CONCLUSION .................... .............................33 <br />APPENDIX <br />A. OAR Chapter 660, Division 34 . ............................... App. 1 -4 <br />B. Metro Plan, Parks and Recreation Facilities Element, February, 2002 .. App. 5 -9 <br />-IN"- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.