New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2006 PROS Plan - Legal Appeals
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
POS Director
>
2006 PROS Plan - Legal Appeals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2014 12:14:45 PM
Creation date
5/30/2014 8:48:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Document_Number
2006 PROS Plan Legal Appeals
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PaLye <br />b. Population Projections and Planning Period for <br />the PROS Plan .. ............................... 17 <br />2. Response .............. .............................18 <br />a. The PROS Planning Period ....................... 18 <br />b. The PROS Population Projection .................. 19 <br />C. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. City of Dundee, <br />203 Or App 207, 124 Pad 1249 (2005) .............. 21 <br />3. Conclusion ............. .............................22 <br />G. Response to Seventh Assignment of Error .............. <br />I ........ 22 <br />The Metro Plan does not require that the PROS Plan include <br />private recreational facilities as partially meeting the demand <br />in Eugene. <br />H. Response to Eighth Assignment of Error ......................... <br />24 <br />The City is not required to adopt the park facilities project list <br />as part of the PROS Plan by state statutes, Goal 2, the LCDC <br />Park Planning Rule, or the Metro Plan. <br />1. Comprehensive Plan ... ............................... <br />24 <br />2. Goal ................. .............................25 <br />3. LCDC Parks Planning Rule ............................. <br />26 <br />4. Metro Plan; Parks and Recreation Facilities Element <br />......... 26 <br />5. Conclusion ............. .............................26 <br />L Response to Ninth Assignment of Error ......................... <br />26 <br />A slam -dunk for the City. <br />J. Response to Tenth Assignment of Error .......................... <br />7 <br />The City's adoption of the PROS Plan is consistent with <br />Statewide Planning Goal 10. <br />-iii- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.