New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2001 Metro - POS Study
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
2001 Metro - POS Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2014 10:51:07 AM
Creation date
5/30/2014 8:03:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
2001
Document_Number
POS - Metro Study
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Cons: <br />• Requires legislative changes to ORS 268 to allow a MSD outside the Portland <br />metropolitan area. <br />• Electors are likely to be skeptical of a new, metropolitan layer of government. <br />• Anti -tax and anti - government sentiment could work against creating a new <br />district. <br />• A new MSD would compete with other local government entities operating <br />within Oregon's property tax constitutional limitations. <br />Inter - Governmental Agreements (IGA) /Memorandum of Agreements (MOA) <br />An agreement affirming the philosophy of cooperation and coordination among and <br />between government entities and /or non - profit organizations (e.g., land trusts and <br />conservancies) to acquire and protect regionally significant lands. <br />Pros: <br />• Pools resources (e.g., staffing, funding, and expertise). <br />• Improves agility in executing land transactions. <br />• Can alleviate constraints posed by political matters and by mandated <br />procedures and regulations. <br />• Improves efficiency by coordinating operations and reducing duplication of <br />efforts. <br />• Provides a forum for resolving conflicts. <br />• Partnerships are attractive to funders. <br />Cons: <br />Requires a high degree of coordination, cooperation, and trust among <br />partners. <br />Redistribution of power can potentially disenfranchise constituencies. <br />LCOG: LANATURALRESOURCEAPARKS OPEN SPA MMETRONFUNDING3.DOC <br />Last Saved: Januan 4, 2002 <br />Open Space Acquisition Funding and Protection Strategies — Draft October 2001 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.