New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Implementation Analysis and Proposal
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
Implementation Analysis and Proposal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 2:40:51 PM
Creation date
5/29/2014 2:38:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
October 19, 2000
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Disadvantages <br />• plans and specs — hard to manage contract if don't do plans and specs <br />• administrative support may suffer or would need to be duplicated in the new division. <br />• construction issues come up — need the person involved in design to answer questions in <br />the field. <br />• More costly to work out issues when construction is occurring than on paper between <br />planning and implementation. <br />• expertise with legal issues with respect to contract administration that currently exist on <br />project teams not as accessible if in separate division <br />• A bulk of LA's in one unit might be more susceptible to budget cutting than if spread out <br />• The diversity on project teams to provide LA as well as civil engineering expertise will be <br />lost and is needed for stormwater, geotech, street, wastewater and other projects. <br />• more difficult to tap construction and civil engineering expertise that exists on project <br />teams if design and construction LA's in new Division <br />October 19, 2000 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.