New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
1998 Final Report Parks Survey
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
1998 Final Report Parks Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2014 10:51:05 AM
Creation date
5/29/2014 2:04:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
January 1998
Document_Number
Eugene Survey Final Report
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Eugene Survey <br />On Athletic Fields, Open Spaces, and Parks <br />January, 1998 <br />Introduction <br />PURPOSE <br />The purpose of the research is to learn the attitudes of Eugene voters regarding a possible ballot <br />measure to maintain and expand Eugene's parks, build new athletic fields, gyms, and swimming <br />pools, and purchase more open spaces. <br />METHODOLOGY <br />A total of 400 interviews of likely Eugene general election voters were completed. The sample <br />was selected and quotas were established to guarantee a statistically accurate representation of <br />the likely voting population in a November, 1998 election. <br />2 <br />The survey has an error margin of approximately 5 %. The actual error margins for subsamples of <br />various sizes is as follows (The right -hand column indicates the percentage providing the <br />response to which the error applies. The top row indicates the sample size.): <br />Sample Size <br />Pct <br />50 <br />100 <br />150 <br />200 <br />250 <br />300 <br />400 <br />10% <br />8% <br />6% <br />5% <br />4% <br />4% <br />3% <br />3% <br />20% <br />11% <br />8% <br />7% <br />6% <br />5% <br />5% <br />4% <br />30% <br />13% <br />9% <br />7% <br />6% <br />6% <br />5% <br />5% <br />40% <br />14% <br />10% <br />8% <br />7% <br />6% <br />6% <br />5% <br />50% <br />14% <br />10% <br />8% <br />7% <br />6% <br />6% <br />5% <br />60% <br />14% <br />10% <br />8% <br />7% <br />6% <br />6% <br />5% <br />70% <br />13% <br />9% <br />7% <br />6% <br />6% <br />5% <br />5% <br />80% <br />11% <br />8% <br />7% <br />6% <br />5% <br />5% <br />4% <br />90% <br />8% <br />6% <br />5% <br />4% <br />4% <br />3% <br />3% <br />Telephone interviews were conducted between January 19 and 23, 1998 by interviewers hired <br />and administered by Advanced Marketing Research of Eugene, Oregon. The response rate was <br />69 %. <br />Deborah Harford Consulting of Eugene, Oregon assisted in the preparation of this report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.