Admin Order 58-97-02-F - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

Administrative Orders/Rules ~ _ - Cover Sheet - . - - -d Z _ d#n'mistrative Order Number: J~8 - ~ ~ - Z ~ ~ ~ . . ri~inating ~eparbuent: ~ T ~-IJ~IG {/~D~S = -~i~l , - - ~ - . p~alrtrnent Contact: ~KSZ~fI D~ J,~;&N~cLi~N 1~~X68Z3~ _ . ~ y eciilis>~ of Signatures: - - - - : - . - Deparf~nent Head (If applicable): ~ ~ . ~ - ~ . _ -Date: y/3o / 4~ ~ ~ ~ - City 112anager (if appli~ablej: ~ - ~ ~ . ,Date: 1. Please Forward to City Recorder's Office ~ • • with Original Administrative Order ~ - . s Administrative Order has been reviewed by the City Attorneys for completeness and to confirm there ar no Ballot Measure 47 implications. This Administrative Order amends the SDC Methodology and rates and includes the following final recommendations: 1.i The SDC rates are being increased to respond to the increased costs of constructing public facilities to serve new development. The SDC rates have been modified from the original January, 1997 proposal, based in part, on public comments received and subsequent staff review (page 5 of Exhibit B, Additional Findings, SDC Rate Table). 2. The system cost tables and Appendix G formulas are incorporated into the revised recommended ~ SDC rates (SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). 3. ~ The underlying methodology adopted in 1991 is not changing; text is being reformatted for clarity and ease of future updates (SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). 4. Future adjustments will be completed pursuant to EC 2.019 and 2.020 and will not be based on the Engineering News Record publication (page 6, section 2.3, SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). 5. The threshold for change of use, with respect to Transportation SOC review, will not change from 3,000 to 1,000 square feet (page 2, 2.1 (2) (d) SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). 6. Detention facilities.are no longer eligible for stormwater SDC credit (E-4, SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). 7. As proposed in January, 1997 private facilities constructed to mitigate the developments impact shall have a sustainable life of 20 years verses the current 10 years, the administrative rate is decreasing from 7.25 to 5%, the administrative charges collected for any single permit will be capped at $30,000 (maximum), and two categories of development types were removed from the trip generation rate table (SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). Th public comment period opened January 21, 1997 and closed February 20, 1997. Copies of the current an ,proposed SDC Methodology documents were posted in four locations. Notification about the public cott~ment period and proposed changes was mailed to approximately 140 persons identified on the interested parties mailing list. Information was placed in the PIC Bulletin with circulation of approximately 250 persons. Public information included a legal advertisement, display advertisement, news release, and public information sessions for public outreach to local stakeholders. A fact sheet was available that addressed the scope of the changes and the effect on cost of development in Eugene relative to other Orggon jurisdictions. Implementation was delayed from March 1, 1997 to May 1, 1997 in order to evaluate - thewntten comments and to discuss issues raised by the original SDC task force members who are now in support of the changes. Notification of the May 1, 1997 implementation.date was also mailed to the same - twd mailing lists on April 14, 1997.