New Search
a~~ <br />CLARK Debbie D <br />From: MECREDY Russ <br />Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:02 AM <br />To: PENWELL Michael J <br />Cc: MATTHEWS Kathleen E; SVENDSEN Glen L; JENSON Emmy R; HAMLIN Peggy D; CLARK <br /> Debbie D <br />Subject: RE: Train Depot Rent <br />Yes this is a Depot project expense GJN 3825. <br />Thahks <br />Russ <br />-----Original Message----- <br />IFrom: PENWELL Michael J <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 2:44 PM <br />To: MECREDY Russ <br />Subject: FW: Train Depot Rent <br />Russ - <br />ls this an allowable project expense? <br />'Mike Penwell <br />Principal Facilities Project Manager <br />'City of Eugene <br />210 Cheshire Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />(541)682-5547 <br />-----Original Message----- <br />~,,, From: MATTHEWS Kathleen E <br />.Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:09 PM <br />To: SVENDSEN Glen L; JENSON Emmy R; PENWELL Michael J <br />Subject: Train Depot Rent <br />I thought I'd put down in writing what I discussed briefly with Glen and Mike today, and with Emmy a couple of days <br />ago, regarding the rent and utilities that fund 618-2619 has been paying for the Express Building at the Train Depot. <br />As of now, we have paid the rent and utilities for the full 12 month period of FY04. These are: <br />Rent Paid $6,177.60 <br />Utilities Paid 615.06 <br />Total Expense $6,792.66 <br />We have also received rent from that property, which for FY04 will be: <br />Rent Received $1,870.00 <br />So, the difference between expenditures and revenue is $4,922.66, which 618-2619 should be reimbursed for since <br />this seems more of a project expense, rather than operating. <br />The question is, is this money coming from the Train Depot project, and if so, who needs to approve of this <br />expenditure? I'd like to get this cleared up before the end of June, if possible. <br /> <br />