1982 ELECTRIC UTILITY CAPITAL BUDGET <br />President Tiffany explained that the revised budget will be somewhat reduced for the next meeting <br />to make sure that EWEB is operating just as tight as it can. He noted that the staff has been pouring over <br />the budget and eliminating those things which cannot be put off, in an attempt to reduce expenses. He <br />said he agreed that this is something that must be done, because the economic conditions in this area are <br />poor. <br />Garry Kunkel presented the following review of the proposed revised street lighting policy <br />rates: <br />"The following discussion of EWEB street lighting service results in a major departure <br />from the method now in use. Representatives of several EWEB divisions and departments have <br />cooperated in the development of the final recommended approach. In addition, staff has <br />taken into account comments of local agency representatives. <br />"HISTORY <br />EWEB has been involved in providing street lighting since it became an entity in 1911. <br />News accounts of the day indicate that on April 3, 1911, voters approved a city - <br />sponsored $25.000 bond issue to be used for street lighting improvement - -later on in <br />the year, on July 17, 1911, an additional bond issue of $30,000 was approved. <br />Until 1948, Eugene's lighting system developed sporadically using various approaches to <br />financing. During the early 1900's, there were cases in which, due to lack of city funds, <br />some merchants themselves purchased and installed lighting systems in public rights of <br />way and later deeded them to the city. <br />By the early 1950 thoughts turned to replacing Eugene's 40 year old ornamental and <br />incandescent lighting system with the then - modern mercury vapor system. At the time, <br />EWEB was providing energy and maintenance to the lighting system. The city purchased <br />the fixtures. <br />During the next ten years, in -depth lighting studies were carried out with the aid of a <br />task force appointed by the mayor. EWEB staff provided technical assistance. <br />Finally, in 1960, the downtown area was fully converted from the ornamental, incadescent <br />lighting system to a "high- intensity" mercury vapor system. <br />About three years prior to the major conversion, a new financing arrangement was worked <br />out with the City of Eugene and was subsequently used with other agencies which requested <br />EWEB lighting services. <br />Essentially, the arrangement provided that EWEB would design the system, purchase and <br />install the fixtures, supply electric energy, and provide operation and maintenance services <br />through a single rate per fixture. <br />The rate was designed to recover the initial capital, labor, and installation costs over a <br />15 -year period. In addition to capital costs, the rate included power cost, factors for <br />photocell replacement, lamp replacement, labor for both, lamp washing costs, contingency <br />for vandalism, and an in lieu of tax factor. <br />Since 1957, when the original street light rates now in effect were adopted, only one major <br />revision has occurred. In 1974, rates per fixture were adjusted by $1.00 to cover increases <br />in capital and non- capital costs (recognizing that the system had fixtures already on the <br />amortization schedule as well as fixtures yet to be installed). <br />In the years 1978, 1979. 1980 and 1981, the rate per fixture has been increased only to <br />reflect the increased power cost component of each fixture. <br />"TODAY'S LIGHTING SYSTEM <br />EWEB presently provides lighting services to ten public agencies which contract for a total <br />of 6,008 individual lighting fixtures. The City of Eugene is by far the largest single customer, <br />now billed for 4,693 - -or 78 percent of all the lights in the metropolitan area. The next largest <br />customer is Santa Clara Water District with 534 lights- -nine percent, followed by River Road <br />Water District with 376, or six percent. <br />1981 <br />1981 Est. <br />1982 <br />BUDGET <br />Actual <br />BUDGET <br />GENERAL PLANT: <br />Buildings & Land <br />$ <br />0 <br />$ 11000 <br />$ 191,950 <br />Office Furniture & Equipment <br />19,900 <br />37,000 <br />46,923 <br />Transportation Equipment <br />100,000 <br />90,000 <br />163,000 <br />Tools <br />58,200 <br />10,000 <br />94,647 <br />$ <br />178,100 <br />$ 138,000 <br />$ 496,520 <br />STEAM MAINS <br />$ <br />40,200 <br />$ 2,000 <br />$ 130,000 <br />STEAM SERVICES <br />$ <br />335,000 <br />$ 180,000 <br />$ 75,000 <br />TOTAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL <br />$8,572,000 <br />$7,528,000 <br />$1,858,220 <br />President Tiffany explained that the revised budget will be somewhat reduced for the next meeting <br />to make sure that EWEB is operating just as tight as it can. He noted that the staff has been pouring over <br />the budget and eliminating those things which cannot be put off, in an attempt to reduce expenses. He <br />said he agreed that this is something that must be done, because the economic conditions in this area are <br />poor. <br />Garry Kunkel presented the following review of the proposed revised street lighting policy <br />rates: <br />"The following discussion of EWEB street lighting service results in a major departure <br />from the method now in use. Representatives of several EWEB divisions and departments have <br />cooperated in the development of the final recommended approach. In addition, staff has <br />taken into account comments of local agency representatives. <br />"HISTORY <br />EWEB has been involved in providing street lighting since it became an entity in 1911. <br />News accounts of the day indicate that on April 3, 1911, voters approved a city - <br />sponsored $25.000 bond issue to be used for street lighting improvement - -later on in <br />the year, on July 17, 1911, an additional bond issue of $30,000 was approved. <br />Until 1948, Eugene's lighting system developed sporadically using various approaches to <br />financing. During the early 1900's, there were cases in which, due to lack of city funds, <br />some merchants themselves purchased and installed lighting systems in public rights of <br />way and later deeded them to the city. <br />By the early 1950 thoughts turned to replacing Eugene's 40 year old ornamental and <br />incandescent lighting system with the then - modern mercury vapor system. At the time, <br />EWEB was providing energy and maintenance to the lighting system. The city purchased <br />the fixtures. <br />During the next ten years, in -depth lighting studies were carried out with the aid of a <br />task force appointed by the mayor. EWEB staff provided technical assistance. <br />Finally, in 1960, the downtown area was fully converted from the ornamental, incadescent <br />lighting system to a "high- intensity" mercury vapor system. <br />About three years prior to the major conversion, a new financing arrangement was worked <br />out with the City of Eugene and was subsequently used with other agencies which requested <br />EWEB lighting services. <br />Essentially, the arrangement provided that EWEB would design the system, purchase and <br />install the fixtures, supply electric energy, and provide operation and maintenance services <br />through a single rate per fixture. <br />The rate was designed to recover the initial capital, labor, and installation costs over a <br />15 -year period. In addition to capital costs, the rate included power cost, factors for <br />photocell replacement, lamp replacement, labor for both, lamp washing costs, contingency <br />for vandalism, and an in lieu of tax factor. <br />Since 1957, when the original street light rates now in effect were adopted, only one major <br />revision has occurred. In 1974, rates per fixture were adjusted by $1.00 to cover increases <br />in capital and non- capital costs (recognizing that the system had fixtures already on the <br />amortization schedule as well as fixtures yet to be installed). <br />In the years 1978, 1979. 1980 and 1981, the rate per fixture has been increased only to <br />reflect the increased power cost component of each fixture. <br />"TODAY'S LIGHTING SYSTEM <br />EWEB presently provides lighting services to ten public agencies which contract for a total <br />of 6,008 individual lighting fixtures. The City of Eugene is by far the largest single customer, <br />now billed for 4,693 - -or 78 percent of all the lights in the metropolitan area. The next largest <br />customer is Santa Clara Water District with 534 lights- -nine percent, followed by River Road <br />Water District with 376, or six percent. <br />