1982 ELECTRIC UTILITY CAPITAL BUDGET
<br />President Tiffany explained that the revised budget will be somewhat reduced for the next meeting
<br />to make sure that EWEB is operating just as tight as it can. He noted that the staff has been pouring over
<br />the budget and eliminating those things which cannot be put off, in an attempt to reduce expenses. He
<br />said he agreed that this is something that must be done, because the economic conditions in this area are
<br />poor.
<br />Garry Kunkel presented the following review of the proposed revised street lighting policy
<br />rates:
<br />"The following discussion of EWEB street lighting service results in a major departure
<br />from the method now in use. Representatives of several EWEB divisions and departments have
<br />cooperated in the development of the final recommended approach. In addition, staff has
<br />taken into account comments of local agency representatives.
<br />"HISTORY
<br />EWEB has been involved in providing street lighting since it became an entity in 1911.
<br />News accounts of the day indicate that on April 3, 1911, voters approved a city -
<br />sponsored $25.000 bond issue to be used for street lighting improvement - -later on in
<br />the year, on July 17, 1911, an additional bond issue of $30,000 was approved.
<br />Until 1948, Eugene's lighting system developed sporadically using various approaches to
<br />financing. During the early 1900's, there were cases in which, due to lack of city funds,
<br />some merchants themselves purchased and installed lighting systems in public rights of
<br />way and later deeded them to the city.
<br />By the early 1950 thoughts turned to replacing Eugene's 40 year old ornamental and
<br />incandescent lighting system with the then - modern mercury vapor system. At the time,
<br />EWEB was providing energy and maintenance to the lighting system. The city purchased
<br />the fixtures.
<br />During the next ten years, in -depth lighting studies were carried out with the aid of a
<br />task force appointed by the mayor. EWEB staff provided technical assistance.
<br />Finally, in 1960, the downtown area was fully converted from the ornamental, incadescent
<br />lighting system to a "high- intensity" mercury vapor system.
<br />About three years prior to the major conversion, a new financing arrangement was worked
<br />out with the City of Eugene and was subsequently used with other agencies which requested
<br />EWEB lighting services.
<br />Essentially, the arrangement provided that EWEB would design the system, purchase and
<br />install the fixtures, supply electric energy, and provide operation and maintenance services
<br />through a single rate per fixture.
<br />The rate was designed to recover the initial capital, labor, and installation costs over a
<br />15 -year period. In addition to capital costs, the rate included power cost, factors for
<br />photocell replacement, lamp replacement, labor for both, lamp washing costs, contingency
<br />for vandalism, and an in lieu of tax factor.
<br />Since 1957, when the original street light rates now in effect were adopted, only one major
<br />revision has occurred. In 1974, rates per fixture were adjusted by $1.00 to cover increases
<br />in capital and non- capital costs (recognizing that the system had fixtures already on the
<br />amortization schedule as well as fixtures yet to be installed).
<br />In the years 1978, 1979. 1980 and 1981, the rate per fixture has been increased only to
<br />reflect the increased power cost component of each fixture.
<br />"TODAY'S LIGHTING SYSTEM
<br />EWEB presently provides lighting services to ten public agencies which contract for a total
<br />of 6,008 individual lighting fixtures. The City of Eugene is by far the largest single customer,
<br />now billed for 4,693 - -or 78 percent of all the lights in the metropolitan area. The next largest
<br />customer is Santa Clara Water District with 534 lights- -nine percent, followed by River Road
<br />Water District with 376, or six percent.
<br />1981
<br />1981 Est.
<br />1982
<br />BUDGET
<br />Actual
<br />BUDGET
<br />GENERAL PLANT:
<br />Buildings & Land
<br />$
<br />0
<br />$ 11000
<br />$ 191,950
<br />Office Furniture & Equipment
<br />19,900
<br />37,000
<br />46,923
<br />Transportation Equipment
<br />100,000
<br />90,000
<br />163,000
<br />Tools
<br />58,200
<br />10,000
<br />94,647
<br />$
<br />178,100
<br />$ 138,000
<br />$ 496,520
<br />STEAM MAINS
<br />$
<br />40,200
<br />$ 2,000
<br />$ 130,000
<br />STEAM SERVICES
<br />$
<br />335,000
<br />$ 180,000
<br />$ 75,000
<br />TOTAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
<br />$8,572,000
<br />$7,528,000
<br />$1,858,220
<br />President Tiffany explained that the revised budget will be somewhat reduced for the next meeting
<br />to make sure that EWEB is operating just as tight as it can. He noted that the staff has been pouring over
<br />the budget and eliminating those things which cannot be put off, in an attempt to reduce expenses. He
<br />said he agreed that this is something that must be done, because the economic conditions in this area are
<br />poor.
<br />Garry Kunkel presented the following review of the proposed revised street lighting policy
<br />rates:
<br />"The following discussion of EWEB street lighting service results in a major departure
<br />from the method now in use. Representatives of several EWEB divisions and departments have
<br />cooperated in the development of the final recommended approach. In addition, staff has
<br />taken into account comments of local agency representatives.
<br />"HISTORY
<br />EWEB has been involved in providing street lighting since it became an entity in 1911.
<br />News accounts of the day indicate that on April 3, 1911, voters approved a city -
<br />sponsored $25.000 bond issue to be used for street lighting improvement - -later on in
<br />the year, on July 17, 1911, an additional bond issue of $30,000 was approved.
<br />Until 1948, Eugene's lighting system developed sporadically using various approaches to
<br />financing. During the early 1900's, there were cases in which, due to lack of city funds,
<br />some merchants themselves purchased and installed lighting systems in public rights of
<br />way and later deeded them to the city.
<br />By the early 1950 thoughts turned to replacing Eugene's 40 year old ornamental and
<br />incandescent lighting system with the then - modern mercury vapor system. At the time,
<br />EWEB was providing energy and maintenance to the lighting system. The city purchased
<br />the fixtures.
<br />During the next ten years, in -depth lighting studies were carried out with the aid of a
<br />task force appointed by the mayor. EWEB staff provided technical assistance.
<br />Finally, in 1960, the downtown area was fully converted from the ornamental, incadescent
<br />lighting system to a "high- intensity" mercury vapor system.
<br />About three years prior to the major conversion, a new financing arrangement was worked
<br />out with the City of Eugene and was subsequently used with other agencies which requested
<br />EWEB lighting services.
<br />Essentially, the arrangement provided that EWEB would design the system, purchase and
<br />install the fixtures, supply electric energy, and provide operation and maintenance services
<br />through a single rate per fixture.
<br />The rate was designed to recover the initial capital, labor, and installation costs over a
<br />15 -year period. In addition to capital costs, the rate included power cost, factors for
<br />photocell replacement, lamp replacement, labor for both, lamp washing costs, contingency
<br />for vandalism, and an in lieu of tax factor.
<br />Since 1957, when the original street light rates now in effect were adopted, only one major
<br />revision has occurred. In 1974, rates per fixture were adjusted by $1.00 to cover increases
<br />in capital and non- capital costs (recognizing that the system had fixtures already on the
<br />amortization schedule as well as fixtures yet to be installed).
<br />In the years 1978, 1979. 1980 and 1981, the rate per fixture has been increased only to
<br />reflect the increased power cost component of each fixture.
<br />"TODAY'S LIGHTING SYSTEM
<br />EWEB presently provides lighting services to ten public agencies which contract for a total
<br />of 6,008 individual lighting fixtures. The City of Eugene is by far the largest single customer,
<br />now billed for 4,693 - -or 78 percent of all the lights in the metropolitan area. The next largest
<br />customer is Santa Clara Water District with 534 lights- -nine percent, followed by River Road
<br />Water District with 376, or six percent.
<br />
|