New Search
AANDERUD Kris <br />From: <br />RISDAL Lacey L <br />Sent: <br />Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:15 AM <br />To: <br />AANDERUD Kris <br />Subject: <br />FW: RL Miesen Hours <br />Follow Up Flag: Follow up <br />Flag Status: Completed <br />Kris, <br />Can you take lead on this fix when you return? I am more than happy to sit down with you and draft out the individual <br />pieces, but knowing someone else is on top of this would ease my mind quite a bit. Thank you! <br />Lacey <br />From: SMITH Tammy D <br />Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 11:09 AM <br />To: RISDAL Lacey L <br />Subject: RE: RL Miesen Hours <br />Lacey, <br />The FY11 hours have to be a GL AJE; the FY12 hours would have to be a combination of JC adjustment and GL AJE. My <br />recommendation since it crosses fiscal years is to process it all as an AJE with two parts. <br />Payroll costs that were charged to 011 will need to be moved. <br />Project will need to be charged a PSF rate and revenue to Fund 632. <br />This will affect your indirect cost plan rate for a few years, but it may be immaterial compared to total hours charged to <br />the fund. <br />Call me if you want to discuss this further. <br />Tammy Smith, x5834 <br />Public Works Administration - Finance is now located at 101 East Broadway 3rd Floor. <br />From: RISDAL Lacey L <br />Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 10:14 AM <br />To: SMITH Tammy D <br />Subject: FW: RL Miesen Hours <br />Tammy, <br />I can't remember when we want to do a Job Costing adjusting journal, and when we don't. Philip has identified some <br />hours that went directly to his PAF (which is part 011 and part 632), but did not charge them to a GJN. We need to <br />adjust that. Should we do this through Job costing, or just through a GL AJE? <br />