New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
NFWF Reimbursement Req #1
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
AR
>
MTOs
>
NFWF Reimbursement Req #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 9:20:47 AM
Creation date
4/27/2011 9:20:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
COE_Contracts
COE_Contract_Number
2009-05417
COE_Contract_Document_Type
AP/AR Invoices
COE_Contract_Status
Active
COE_Contract_Organization
NFWF
Contract_Administrator
Aanderud
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. Fringe benefit rates. If overall fringe benefit rates are not approved for the governmental unit <br />as part of the central service cost allocation plan, these rates will be reviewed, negotiated and <br />approved for individual grantee agencies during the indirect cost negotiation process. In these <br />cases, a proposed fringe benefit rate computation should accompany the indirect cost proposal. If <br />fringe benefit rates are not used at the grantee agency level (i.e., the agency specifically <br />identifies fringe benefit costs to individual employees), the governmental unit should so advise <br />the cognizant agency. <br />2. Billed services provided by the grantee agency. In some cases, governmental units provide <br />and bill for services similar to those covered by central service cost allocation plans (e.g., <br />computer centers). Where this occurs, the governmental unit should be guided by the <br />requirements in Attachment C relating to the development of billing rates and documentation <br />requirements, and should advise the cognizant agency of any billed services. Reviews of these <br />types of services (including reviews of costing/billing methodology, profits or losses, etc.) will <br />be made on a case-by-case basis as warranted by the circumstances involved. <br />3. Indirect cost allocations not using rates. In certain situations, a governmental unit, because of <br />the nature of its awards, may be required to develop a cost allocation plan that distributes <br />indirect (and, in some cases, direct) costs to the specific funding sources. In these cases, a <br />narrative cost allocation methodology should be developed, documented, maintained for audit, or <br />submitted, as appropriate, to the cognizant agency for review, negotiation, and approval. <br />4. Appeals. If a dispute arises in a negotiation of an indirect cost rate (or other rate) between the <br />cognizant agency and the governmental unit, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the <br />appeals procedures of the cognizant agency. <br />5. Collection of unallowable costs and erroneous payments. Costs specifically identified as <br />unallowable and charged to Federal awards either directly or indirectly will be refunded <br />(including interest chargeable in accordance with applicable Federal agency regulations). <br />6. OMB assistance. To the extent that problems are encountered among the Federal agencies <br />and/or governmental units in connection with the negotiation and approval process, OMB will <br />lend assistance, as required, to resolve such problems in a timely manner. <br />57 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.