New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
AJE 58115
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
JEs
>
AJEs
>
AJE 58115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2011 6:10:22 AM
Creation date
12/16/2010 2:06:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Capital
PW_Document_Type_Capital
Journal Entry
PW_Active
Yes
External_View
No
GL_Project_Number
922272
935662
Document_Number
AJE 58115
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
If you could update the description with at least the following info "Xfr FY07 Temp ee chrgs/PSF <br />to various Park Capital Projects POSkla" Please send me a copy of the JE for our project files <br />when changes and approval have been done. <br />Thanks... <br />-Debbie <br />From: RISDAL Lacey L <br />Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 12:42 PM <br />To: CLARK Debbie D; AANDERUD Kris <br />Subject: RE: JE for Justin Grishkin cap project time <br />Debbie, <br />We are no longer using the temp system. We changed this process at the start of FY07 due to the fact that we didn't want <br />to charge OH rates on temps any longer. A couple factors brought on this change. First, with the rise of donations/grants <br />funding specific work that the City used temps for, we couldn't justify charging an OH rate on temps. The grantor/donator <br />could contract to have the work done themselves at a cheaper rate. So it was in our best interests to not charge the rate. <br />With the 632 fund being in a healthier state, we didn't need to rely on this revenue as much as when the process started a <br />couple years ago. Secondly, since we weren't processing the rate on temps, and Eric's quantity of seasonals on the <br />wetlands crew was at a lower level than in previous years, he didn't need the process to help ease the bill-coding/paying <br />process. These changes were discussed with Tammy and Susan at the start of the FY and wrapped into my PSF model. <br />As far as the revenue goes, we should definitely bring revenue into the 632 fund and that was my oversight in providing <br />direction to Kris. Thanks for pointing this out! We'll add those lines to the JE <br />Thanks for the thorough review of the JE and let me know if you have any questions on the temp changes I described <br />above. <br />Lacey <br />From: CLARK Debbie D <br />Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 6:29 AM <br />To: RISDAL Lacey L; AANDERUD Kris <br />Subject: RE: JE for Justin Grishkin cap project time <br />I looked through the JE and have some questions and suggestions. <br />1) Are you no longer using the Temp system? <br />2) Are you only wanting to bill. the project the Selectemp rate? No overhead using the FY07 <br />multiplier? <br />3) Wouldn't you want to create revenue in Fund 632 for this? <br />I would suggest changing two of the funds, updating the JE description and adding GJN's to the <br />Line Reference field. I will also have to contact a few project managers getting the approval for the <br />expense. It's not an issue but to let them know what will be showing up on their projects. <br />-Debbie <br />From: AANDERUD Kris <br />Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 12:00 PM <br />To: CLARK Debbie D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.