New Search
From: <br />MOULTON Debbie M <br />Sent: <br />Tuesday, June 17, 2008 4:32 PM <br />To: <br />JOSEPH Cathy A <br />Cc: <br />DALE Randal J <br />Subject: <br />FW: City of Eugene Street lights/signals & Guardrail IGA's <br />How do we handle this???? Thx! <br />From: MISHOU Betty J [mailto:Bettv.MISHOU(&co.lane.or.usl <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:35 PM <br />To: MOULTON Debbie M <br />Cc: CHASTAIN Ed; DILLIN Karen F; PETSCH John S <br />Subject: City of Eugene Street lights/signals & Guardrail IGA's <br />Hi Debbie, our legal counsel has a couple of revisions for the above agreements (see below). Could you make these <br />changes and add our LM 21.130 attachment to the agreements? If you have questions, please call (ext. 6920) or email <br />me. Thanks, Betty <br />Administrative Services <br />3040 Delta Hwy North <br />Eugene, OR 97408 <br />(541) 682-6920 <br /><< File: LM 21130 STANDARD PROVISIONS 2008 02 13.doc <br />From: <br />KARDELL Marc H <br />Sent: <br />Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:16 AM <br />To, <br />DILLIN Karen F <br />Subject: <br />IGA with Eugene for street lights <br />Karen, under the recitals, C., where we list the exhibits. We should list an Ex D, our LM 21.130 provisions. We have the <br />City's standard provisions at Ex A, but not ours. Then, under paragraph 9, which refers to Ex A, we need to change that to <br />read "The parties shall comply with the respective standard contract provisions, at Ex A and Ex D" or words similar to that. <br />I know that we typically don't do work for the City under this agreement, but it is a two way agreement, and if we did do any <br />work as the contract allows, we should have our 21.130 provisions attached. <br />Let me know if questions. <br />